The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex- and Age-related Differences in Morphine Requirements for Postoperative Pain Relief
Open accessAbstract
Background: Sex-related differences in the perception of pain and susceptibility to opioids remain a matter of debate. Intravenous morphine titration used to obtain pain relief in the immediate postoperative period is a unique clinical model for assessing the effect of sex on reported pain. Because of the wide variation in dose requirements for pain management, the authors conducted a prospective study in a large population and also assessed the effect of aging. Methods: Intravenous morphine titration was administered as a bolus of 2 (body weight <or= 60 kg) or 3 mg (body weight > 60 kg) during the immediate postoperative period. The interval between each bolus was 5 min. The visual analog pain scale (VAS) threshold required to administer morphine was 30, and pain relief was defined as a VAS score of 30 or less. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD. Results: Data from 4,317 patients were analyzed; 54% of the patients were male, and 46% were female. The mean morphine dose required to obtain pain relief was 11.9 +/- 6.8 mg or 0.173 +/- 0.103 mg/kg. Women had a higher initial VAS score (74 +/- 19 vs. 71 +/- 19; P < 0.001) and required a greater dose of morphine (0.183 +/- 0.111 vs. 0.165 +/- 0.095 mg/kg; P < 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference was noted in elderly (aged > 75 yr) patients (0.163 +/- 0.083 vs. 0.157 +/- 0.085 mg/kg). Conclusion: Women experienced more severe postoperative pain and required a greater dose (+11%) of morphine than men in the immediate postoperative period. This sex-related difference disappeared in elderly patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, females are reported to require 11% greater doses of morphine on average compared with males in order to achieve adequate postoperative analgesia.65”
From Preoperative predictors of poor acute postoperative pain control: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [65]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods
Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., & Braver, S. (1986) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9 · Cited by 3,275
Berkley, K. J. (1997) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x97221485 · Cited by 1,125
Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: a meta-analysis
Riley, J. L., Robinson, M. E., Wise, E. A., Myers, C. D., & Fillingim, R. B. (1998) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00199-1 · Cited by 1,085
Ohnhaus, E. E., & Adler, R. (1975) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90075-5 · Cited by 797
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings
Fillingim, R. B., King, C. D., Ribeiro-Dasilva, M. C., Rahim-Williams, B., & Riley, J. L. (2009) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.001 · Cited by 2,766
Predictors of Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Consumption: A Qualitative Systematic Review
Ip, H. Y. V., Abrishami, A., Peng, P. W. H., Wong, J., & Chung, F. (2009) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e3181aae87a · Cited by 1,055
Yang, M. M. H., Hartley, R. L., Leung, A. A., Ronksley, P. E., Jetté, N., Casha, S., & Riva-Cambrin, J. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025091 · Cited by 414
Let’s talk about sex: Differences in drug therapy in males and females
Madla, C. M., Gavins, F. K. H., Merchant, H. A., Orlu, M., Murdan, S., & Basit, A. W. (2021) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.014 · Cited by 167
Bruehl, S., Burns, J. W., Chung, O. Y., & Chont, M. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.12.003 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Aubrun, F., Salvi, N., Coriat, P., & Riou, B.
- Affiliations
- Staff Anesthesiologist.
- Resident in Anesthesiology.
- Professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Chairman, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care.
- Professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Chairman, Department of Emergency Medicine and Surgery.
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 2005-07-01
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 156-160
- ISSN
- 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964792919
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 15.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Keywords
- sex differences, postoperative pain, morphine consumption, opioid analgesia, aging, elderly patients, pain perception, visual analogue scale
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morphine, Pain Measurement, Postoperative Pain, Prospective Studies, Sex Characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review