Cited by 80Dermatologic Treatments and ResearchTattoo and Body Piercing ComplicationsCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Q-Switched Ruby Laser Treatment of Tattoos and Benign Pigmented Skin Lesions: A Critical Review

Raulin, Christian, Schönermark, Matthias P., Greve, Baerbel, Werner, Saskia·1998·Annals of Plastic Surgery

Abstract

The Q-switched ruby laser (694 nm, 25-40 nsec) is an effective and safe therapeutic device for the treatment of tattoos and well-defined, benign, pigmented epidermal and dermal lesions. Because of its selective mode of action, dermal pigments of natural and artificial origin are destroyed photothermically and removed without scar. This method is exceptionally suited for the elimination of lay and professional tattoos, traumatic tattoos, and permanent makeup. Other frequent indications include benign pigmented lesions such as lentigines, freckles, café-au-lait spots, seborrheic keratosis, and Becker nevi. As a dermal pigmented lesion, the nevus of Ota is perfectly treatable. However, chloasma can no longer be considered an indication for ruby laser treatment due to unsatisfactory results. Melanocytic nevi and congenital nevi should be treated only in clinical studies. The effectiveness of the long-term epilation of dark hair with this laser device has to be verified in future investigations. Particularly attractive is the nonproblematic and straightforward removal of pigmented lesions in precarious anatomic regions like the lips, eyelids, and genitals (e.g., benign melanosis of the lips or of the penis, seborrheic keratosis of the lid angle).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000637-199811000-00018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Raulin, C., Schönermark, M. P., Greve, B., & Werner, S.
Affiliations
  • Laserklinik Karlsruhe (DE)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
  • Raulin, Christian
  • Werner, Saskia
Venue
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Published
1998-11
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
555-565
ISSN
0148-7043 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068280239
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Keywords
Q-switched ruby laser, tattoo removal, dermal pigmentation, permanent makeup, lentigines, café-au-lait spots, seborrheic keratosis, Becker nevus, nevus of Ota, melasma, melanocytic nevi, congenital melanocytic nevus
MeSH terms
Humans, Nevus, Pigmentation Disorders, Skin, Tattooing, Keratosis, Seborrheic, Laser Therapy, Dermatologic Surgical Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review