The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Response of Protein and Urea Kinetics in Burn Patients to Different Levels of Protein Intake
Open accessAbstract
The effects of two levels of protein intake on protein metabolism in six severely burned adult patients were studied (means of 70% BSA burned). A crossover experimental design enabled the authors to study each patient at the end of two three-day dietary regimens. All diets were isocaloric and provided approximately 25% more calories than the measured energy expenditure (means = 40.8 Kcal/kg X day). In one regimen, each patient received 2.2 g protein/kg X day, while during the other treatment period they received 1.4 g protein/kg X day. The patients were studied in the fed state and after 10 to 12 hours of fasting. Leucine kinetics were determined by means of the primed-constant infusion of [1--13C]--leucine. The authors were able to distinguish the oxidation of plasma leucine from the oxidation of leucine derived from intracellular protein at the site of the deamination of leucine (predominantly muscle) by simultaneously determining both leucine and alpha-ketoisocaproic acid enrichment. Also, rates of whole-body protein synthesis and catabolism were calculated from the leucine flux and oxidation data. Net protein synthesis was also calculated by means of another stable-isotope technique involving the infusion of [15N2]--urea. Finally, a third means of estimating net protein catabolism based on urinary N-excretion data was used at the same time that the isotopic studies were performed. The 13C leucine-data and the N-excretion data indicated that a balance between protein synthesis and catabolism could be achieved with a protein intake of 1.4 protein/kg X day. When protein intake was increased to 2.2 g protein/kg X day, neither isotopic method indicated a further beneficial effect on net protein synthesis, although the absolute rates of protein synthesis and catabolism were stimulated. The N-excretion data, on the other hand, indicated a significant improvement in net protein synthesis with higher protein intake. Regardless of the level of protein intake, the underlying alterations in protein metabolism that occurred as a response to burn injury persisted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nicolo, M., Heyland, D. K., Chittams, J., Sammarco, T., & Compher, C. (2016) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1177/0148607115583675 · Cited by 294
Optimal protein requirements during the first 2 weeks after the onset of critical illness
Ishibashi, N., Plank, L. D., Sando, K., & Hill, G. L. (1998) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-199809000-00020 · Cited by 245
The metabolic effects of thermal injury
Tredget, E. E., & Yu, Y. M. (1992) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/bf02067117 · Cited by 149
Potential Ergogenic Effects of Arginine and Creatine Supplementation
Paddon-Jones, D., Børsheim, E., & Wolfe, R. R. (2004) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/134.10.2888s · Cited by 119
Self-citationSinger (2009) · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2013.12.004 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- WOLFE, R. R., GOODENOUGH, R. D., BURKE, J. F., & WOLFE, M. H.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 1983-02
- Volume
- 197
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-171
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983176108
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of Protein and Urea Kinetics in Burn Patients to Different Levels of Protein Intake. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-198302000-00007
- The paper
- WOLFE, R. R., GOODENOUGH, R. D., BURKE, J. F., & WOLFE, M. H. (1983). Response of Protein and Urea Kinetics in Burn Patients to Different Levels of Protein Intake. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198302000-00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.