The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-limb Gastric Bypass in the Superobese: A Prospective Randomized Study
Open accessAbstract
This study was designed to determine whether greater diversion of bile and pancreatic secretions away from the functional gastrointestinal tract would produce greater weight loss in superobese patients (greater than or equal to 200 pounds overweight) in comparison with conventional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). During the past 7 years, two modifications of RYGB were prospectively compared in 45 superobese patients: RYGB-1, in which the length of defunctionalized jejunum measured 75 cm, and RYGB-2, in which the defunctionalized jejunum measured 150 cm. Respective mean preoperative weight/body mass indexes were 393 pounds/63.4 for 22 RYGB-1 patients and 404 pounds/61.6 for 23 RYGB-2 patients. Two patients (5%) had nonfatal early complications. There were six late incisional hernias. There were no cases of protein deficiency, hepatic dysfunction, or diarrhea after operation. Mean follow-up was 43 +/- 17 months. Postoperative weight loss in pounds and daily calorie intake were compared at 6-month intervals. Weight loss stabilized by 24 months at a mean 50% excess weight lost in RYGB-1 patients and 64% excess weight lost in RYGB-2 patients. Nineteen of 23 RYGB-2 patients achieved at least 50% excess weight lost versus 11 of 22 RYGB-1 patients (p less than or equal to 0.03). Weight loss was significantly greater at 24 through 36 months in RYGB-2 versus RYGB-1 patients (p less than 0.02). There was no significant difference in either calorie intake or incidence of iron and vitamin B-12 deficiency between the two groups. These data show that gastric restriction and biliopancreatic diversion without intestinal exclusion resulted in significantly greater weight loss than conventional RYGB but did not cause additional metabolic sequelae or diarrhea. This long-limb modification of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a safe and effective procedure in patients who are 200 pounds or more overweight.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: A systematic literature review
Chapman, A. (2004) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0039-6060(03)00392-1 · Cited by 529
Heber, D., Greenway, F. L., Kaplan, L. M., Livingston, E., Salvador, J., & Still, C. (2010) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2009-2128 · Cited by 521
Lee, W.-J., Yu, P.-J., Wang, W., Chen, T.-C., Wei, P.-L., & Huang, M.-T. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000167762.46568.98 · Cited by 479
Bariatric surgery and long-term control of morbid obesity
Brolin, R. E. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.22.2793 · Cited by 474
Self-citationNonsurgical Factors That Influence the Outcome of Bariatric Surgery: A Review
Hsu, L. K. G., Benotti, P. N., Dwyer, J., Roberts, S. B., Saltzman, E., Shikora, S., Rolls, B. J., & Rand, W. (1998) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-199805000-00021 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- BROLIN, R. E., KENLER, H. A., GORMAN, J. H., & CODY, R. P.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 387
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061204347
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-limb Gastric Bypass in the Superobese: A Prospective Randomized Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-199204000-00014
- The paper
- BROLIN, R. E., KENLER, H. A., GORMAN, J. H., & CODY, R. P. (1992). Long-limb Gastric Bypass in the Superobese: A Prospective Randomized Study. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199204000-00014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.