The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Abbreviated Laparotomy and Planned Reoperation for Critically Injured Patients
Open accessAbstract
The triad of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy in critically injured patients is a vicious cycle that, if uninterrupted, is rapidly fatal. During the past 7.5 years, 200 patients were treated with unorthodox techniques to abruptly terminate the laparotomy and break the cycle. One hundred seventy patients (85%) suffered penetrating injuries and 30 (15%) were victims of blunt trauma. The mean Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, and Trauma Index Severity Score age combination index predicted survival were 5.06%, 33.2%, and 57%, respectively. Resuscitative thoracotomies were performed in 60 (30%) patients. After major sources of hemorrhage were controlled, the following clinical and laboratory mean values were observed: red cell transfusions--22 units, core temperature--32.1 C, and pH--7.09. Techniques to abbreviate the operation included the ligation of enteric injuries in 34 patients, retained vascular clamps in 13, temporary intravascular shunts in four, packing of diffusely bleeding surfaces in 171, and the use of multiple towel clips to close only the skin of the abdominal wall in 178. Patients then were transported to the surgical intensive care unit for vigorous correction of metabolic derangements and coagulopathies. Ninety-eight patients (49%) survived to undergo planned reoperation (mean delay 48.1 hours), and 66 of 98 (67%) survived to leave the hospital. With the exception of intravascular shunts, there were survivors who were treated by each of the unorthodox techniques. Of 102 patients who died before reoperation 68 (67%) did so within 2 hours of the initial procedure. Logistic regression showed that red cell transfusion rate and pH may be helpful in determining when to consider abbreviated laparotomy. The authors conclude that patients with hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy are at high risk for imminent death, and that prompt termination of laparotomy with the use of the above techniques is a rational approach to an apparently hopeless situation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE DAMAGE CONTROL SEQUENCE AND UNDERLYING LOGIC
Rotondo, M. F., & Zonies, D. H. (1997) · Surgical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70582-x · Cited by 441
Damage control surgery for abdominal emergencies
Weber, D. G., Bendinelli, C., & Balogh, Z. J. (2014) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.9360 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- BURCH, J. M., ORTIZ, V. B., RICHARDSON, R. J., MARTIN, R. R., MATTOX, K. L., & JORDAN, G. L.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 476-484
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052001890
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abbreviated Laparotomy and Planned Reoperation for Critically Injured Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-199205000-00010
- The paper
- BURCH, J. M., ORTIZ, V. B., RICHARDSON, R. J., MARTIN, R. R., MATTOX, K. L., & JORDAN, G. L. (1992). Abbreviated Laparotomy and Planned Reoperation for Critically Injured Patients. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199205000-00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.