The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Is Early Oral Feeding Safe After Elective Colorectal Surgery? A Prospective Randomized Trial
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: The routine use of a nasogastric tube after elective colorectal surgery is no longer mandatory. More recently, early feeding after laparoscopic colectomy has been shown to be safe and well tolerated. Therefore, the aim of our study was to prospectively assess the safety and tolerability of early oral feeding after elective "open" abdominal colorectal operations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent elective laparotomy with either colon or small bowel resection between November 1992 and April 1994 were prospectively randomized to one of the following two groups: group 1: early oral feeding--all patients received a clear liquid diet on the first postoperative day followed by a regular diet as tolerated; group 2: regular feeding--all patients were treated in the "traditional" way, with feeding only after the resolution of their postoperative ileus. The nasogastric tube was removed from all patients in both groups immediately after surgery. The patients were monitored for vomiting, bowel movements, nasogastric tube reinsertion, time of regular diet consumption, complications, and length of hospitalization. The nasogastric tube was reinserted if two or more episodes of vomiting of more than 100 mL occurred in the absence of bowel movement. Ileus was considered resolved after a bowel movement in the absence of abdominal distention or vomiting. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one consecutive patients were studied, 80 patients in group 1 (34 males and 46 females, mean age 51 years [range 16-82 years]), and 81 patients in group 2 (43 males and 38 females, mean age 56 years [range 20-90 years]). Sixty-three patients (79%) in the early feeding group tolerated the early feeding schedule and were advanced to regular diet within the next 24 to 48 hours. There were no significant differences between the early and regular feeding groups in the rate of vomiting (21% vs. 14%), nasogastric tube reinsertion (11% vs. 10%), length of ileus (3.8 +/- 0.1 days vs. 4.1 +/- 0.1 days), length of hospitalization (6.2 +/- 0.2 days vs. 6.8 +/- 0.2 days), or overall complications (7.5% vs. 6.1%), respectively, (p = NS for all). However, the patients in the early feeding group tolerated a regular diet significantly earlier than did the patients in the regular feeding group (2.6 +/- 0.1 days vs. 5 +/- 0.1 days; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Early oral feeding after elective colorectal surgery is safe and can be tolerated by the majority of patients. Thus, it may become a routine feature of postoperative management in these patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery
Weimann, A., Braga, M., Carli, F., Higashiguchi, T., Hübner, M., Klek, S., Laviano, A., Ljungqvist, O., Lobo, D. N., Martindale, R., et al. (2017) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013 · Cited by 1,881
ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Surgery including Organ Transplantation
Weimann, A., Braga, M., Harsanyi, L., Laviano, A., Ljungqvist, O., Soeters, P., Jauch, K. W., Kemen, M., Hiesmayr, J. M., Horbach, T., et al. (2006) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.015 · Cited by 1,119
Lewis, S. J., Egger, M., Sylvester, P. A., & Thomas, S. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7316.773 · Cited by 858
ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in inflammatory bowel disease
Forbes, A., Escher, J., Hébuterne, X., Kłęk, S., Krznaric, Z., Schneider, S., Shamir, R., Stardelova, K., Wierdsma, N., Wiskin, A. E., et al. (2017) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.12.027 · Cited by 625
RetractedPostoperative ileus: a preventable event
Holte, K., & Kehlet, H. (2000) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01595.x · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Reissman, P., Teoh, T.-A., Cohen, S. M., Weiss, E. G., Nogueras, J. J., & Wexner, S. D.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 222
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-77
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992324415
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Early Oral Feeding Safe After Elective Colorectal Surgery? A Prospective Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-199507000-00012
- The paper
- Reissman, P., Teoh, T.-A., Cohen, S. M., Weiss, E. G., Nogueras, J. J., & Wexner, S. D. (1995). Is Early Oral Feeding Safe After Elective Colorectal Surgery? A Prospective Randomized Trial. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199507000-00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.