The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surgical Treatment in Proximal Bile Duct Cancer: A Single-Center Experience
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the experience and results of a single center in surgical treatment of proximal bile duct carcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Whenever feasible, surgery is the appropriate treatment in proximal bile duct carcinoma. To improve survival rates and with special regard to liver transplantation, the extent of surgical radicalness remains an open issue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 249 patients who underwent surgery for proximal bile duct carcinoma via the following procedures: resection (n = 125), liver transplantation (n = 25), and exploratory laparotomy (n = 99). Survival rates were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method, uni- and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors, and log rank test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Survival rates after resection and liver transplantation are correlated with international Union Against Cancer (UICC) tumor stage (resection: overall 5-year, 27.1%; stage I and II, 41.9%; stage IV, 20.7%; liver transplantation: overall 5-year, 17.1%; stage I and II, 37.8%; stage IV, 5.8%). Significant univariate prognostic factors for survival after liver resection were lymph node involvement (N category), tumor stage, tumor-free margins, and vascular invasion; for transplantation, they were local tumor extent, N category, tumor stage, and infiltration of liver parenchyma. For resection and transplantation, a multivariate analysis showed prognostic significance of tumor stage and tumor-free margins. CONCLUSION: Resection remains the treatment of choice in proximal bile duct carcinoma. Whenever possible, decisions about resectability should be made during laparotomy. With regard to the observation of long-term survivors, liver transplantation still can be justified in selected patients with stage II carcinoma. It is unknown whether more radical procedures, such as liver transplantation combined with multivisceral resections, will lead to better outcome in advanced stages. With regard to palliation, surgical drainage of the biliary system performed as hepatojejunostomy can be recommended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MAKUUCHI, M., Thai, B. L., Takayasu, K., Takayama, T., Kosuge, T., Gunvén, P., Yamazaki, S., Hasegawa, H., & Ozaki, H. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 1,120
Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic duct at its bifurcation within the porta hepatis
Klatskin, G. (1965) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(65)90178-6 · Cited by 820
Management Strategies in Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
BISMUTH, H., NAKACHE, R., & DIAMOND, T. (1992) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199201000-00005 · Cited by 807
Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver.
Bismuth, H., & Corlette, M. B. (1975) · PubMed · Cited by 751
Shepherd, H. A., Royle, G. T., Ross, A. P. R., Diba, A., Arthur, M. J. P., & Colin-Jones, D. G. (1988) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800751207 · Cited by 542
Hepatic segmentectomy with caudate lobe resection for bile duct carcinoma of the hepatic hilus
Nimura, Y., Hayakawa, N., Kamiya, J., Kondo, S., & Shionoya, S. (1990) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/bf01658686 · Cited by 506
Klatskin, G. (1965) · PubMed · Cited by 480
Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Postoperative Radiotherapy Does Not Improve Survival
Pitt, H. A., Nakeeb, A., Abrams, R. A., Coleman, J., Piantadosi, S., Yeo, C. J., Lillemoe, K. D., & Cameron, J. L. (1995) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199506000-00017 · Cited by 299
Abdominal Organ Cluster Transplantation for the Treatment of Upper Abdominal Malignancies
STARZL, T. E., TODO, S., TZAKIS, A., PODESTA, L., MIELES, L., DEMETRIS, A., TEPERMAN, L., SELBY, R., STEVENSON, W., STIEBER, A., et al. (1989) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-198909000-00013 · Cited by 255
Bornman, P., Tobias, R., Harries-Jones, E. P., Stiegmann, G., & Terblanche, J. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90719-1 · Cited by 235
Cited by
One Thousand Fifty-Six Hepatectomies Without Mortality in 8 Years
Imamura, H. (2003) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1198 · Cited by 835
Rea, D. J., Heimbach, J. K., Rosen, C. B., Haddock, M. G., Alberts, S. R., Kremers, W. K., Gores, G. J., & Nagorney, D. M. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000179678.13285.fa · Cited by 693
Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study
Ortner, M. E. J., Caca, K., Berr, F., Liebetruth, J., Mansmann, U., Huster, D., Voderholzer, W., Schachschal, G., Mössner, J., & Lochs, H. (2003) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/j.gastro.2003.07.015 · Cited by 608
Total and segmental liver volume variations: Implications for liver surgery
Abdalla, E. K., Denys, A., Chevalier, P., Nemr, R. A., & Vauthey, J.-N. (2004) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2003.08.024 · Cited by 286
Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cholangiocarcinoma: 1990-2009
Aljiffry, M., Walsh, M. J., & Molinari, M. (2009) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.15.4240 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Pichlmayr, R., Weimann, A., Klempnauer, J., Oldhafer, K. J., Maschek, H., Tusch, G., & Ringe, B.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 224
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 628-638
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079615634
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 11.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surgical Treatment in Proximal Bile Duct Cancer: A Single-Center Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-199611000-00007
- The paper
- Pichlmayr, R., Weimann, A., Klempnauer, J., Oldhafer, K. J., Maschek, H., Tusch, G., & Ringe, B. (1996). Surgical Treatment in Proximal Bile Duct Cancer: A Single-Center Experience. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199611000-00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.