Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 453

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinical Experience With a Bioartificial Liver in the Treatment of Severe Liver Failure: A Phase I Clinical Trial

Open access
Watanabe, Frederick D., Mullon, Claudy J-P, Hewitt, Winston R., Arkadopoulos, Nicholas, Kahaku, Elaine, Eguchi, Susumu, Khalili, Theodore, Arnaout, Walid, Shackleton, Christopher R., Rozga, Jacek, Solomon, Barry, Demetriou, Achilles A.·1997·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a bioartificial liver (BAL) to treat patients with severe liver failure until they can be either transplanted or recover spontaneously. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Severe acute liver failure is associated with high mortality. Liver transplantation has emerged as an effective therapy for patients who did not respond to standard management. However, because of the donor organ shortage and urgent need for transplantation, many patients die before they can be transplanted and others do not survive after transplantation, primarily because of intracranial hypertension. METHODS: Three groups of patients with severe acute liver failure were treated with the BAL. In group 1 (n = 18) were patients with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF), in group 2 (n = 3) were patients with primary nonfunction (PNF) of a transplanted liver, and in group 3 (n = 10) were patients with acute exacerbation of chronic liver disease. Patients in groups 1 and 2 were candidates for transplantation at the time they entered the study, whereas patients in group 3 were not. RESULTS: In group 1, 16 patients were "bridged" successfully to transplantation, 1 patient was bridged to recovery without a transplant, and 1 patient died because of concomitant severe pancreatitis. In group 2, all patients were bridged successfully to retransplantation. In group 3, two patients were supported to recovery and successful transplants at later dates; the other eight patients, although supported temporarily with the BAL, later died because they were not candidates for transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' clinical experience with the BAL has yielded encouraging results. A randomized, controlled, prospective trial (phase II-III) is being initiated to determine the efficacy of the system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000658-199705000-00005

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 453

Metadata

Authors
Watanabe, F. D., Mullon, C. J.-P., Hewitt, W. R., Arkadopoulos, N., Kahaku, E., Eguchi, S., Khalili, T., Arnaout, W., Shackleton, C. R., Rozga, J., Solomon, B., & Demetriou, A. A.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
1997-05
Volume
225
Issue
5
Pages
484-494
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984010318
Cited by
453
References
0
FWCI
44.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Experience With a Bioartificial Liver in the Treatment of Severe Liver Failure: A Phase I Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-199705000-00005
The paper
Watanabe, F. D., Mullon, C. J.-P., Hewitt, W. R., Arkadopoulos, N., Kahaku, E., Eguchi, S., Khalili, T., Arnaout, W., Shackleton, C. R., Rozga, J., Solomon, B., & Demetriou, A. A. (1997). Clinical Experience With a Bioartificial Liver in the Treatment of Severe Liver Failure: A Phase I Clinical Trial. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199705000-00005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.