The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Split Liver Transplantation: King's College Hospital Experience
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of split liver transplantation is to increase the source of pediatric grafts without compromising the adult donor pool. Early results have been discouraging because of technical complications and selection of poor risk patients. METHODS: The results of a single center experience of 41 split liver transplantations were analyzed. Patient and graft survival and complications related to the technique were analyzed. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival for the whole group was 90% and 88% respectively at a median follow up of 12 months (range 6-70 months). Patient and graft survival for the right lobe graft was 95% and the left lateral segment 86% and 82% respectively. Four patients died, of which two of the patients were first two splits following technical complications. Two others died, one from cerebral lymphoma and the other of multiorgan failure secondary to sepsis. One patient has been retransplanted for chronic biliary sepsis. CONCLUSION: Split liver transplantation has now become an acceptable treatment option for both adult and pediatric recipients with end stage liver disease. Right lobe recipients are not disadvantaged by the procedure. Good results can be achieved with better patient selection and by the use of good quality organs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Surgical anatomy and anatomical surgery of the liver
Bismuth, H. (1982) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/bf01656368 · Cited by 791
Cited by
Ito, T., Kiuchi, T., Yamamoto, H., Oike, F., Ogura, Y., Fujimoto, Y., Hirohashi, K., & Tanaka, A. K. (2003) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/01.tp.0000063707.90525.10 · Cited by 288
Adam, R., Cailliez, V., Majno, P., Karam, V., McMaster, P., Calne, R. Y., O'Grady, J., Pichlmayr, R., Neuhaus, P., Otte, J.-B., et al. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02603-9 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Rela, M., Vougas, V., Muiesan, P., Vilca-Melendez, H., Smyrniotis, V., Gibbs, P., Karani, J., Williams, R., & Heaton, N.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 227
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 282-288
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990397321
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Split Liver Transplantation: King's College Hospital Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-199802000-00019
- The paper
- Rela, M., Vougas, V., Muiesan, P., Vilca-Melendez, H., Smyrniotis, V., Gibbs, P., Karani, J., Williams, R., & Heaton, N. (1998). Split Liver Transplantation: King's College Hospital Experience. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199802000-00019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.