The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Patterns of Spread, the Importance of Hepatic Resection for Curative Operation, and a Presurgical Clinical Staging System
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the resectability rate for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, to analyze reasons for unresectability, and to devise a presurgical clinical T-staging system. METHODS: Ninety patients with hilar cholangiocarcinomas seen between March 1, 1991, and April 1, 1997, were evaluated. Accurate patterns of disease progression and therapy were evaluable. Disease was staged in 87 patients using extent of ductal tumor involvement, portal vein compromise, and liver atrophy. RESULTS: In 21 patients, disease was deemed unresectable for cure at presentation. In 39 patients, disease was found to be unresectable at laparotomy, 23 secondary to nodal (N2) or distant metastases. Unresectability was the result of metastases in 52% and of locally advanced disease in 28%. Thirty patients (33%) had resection of all gross disease, and 25 of these (83%) had negative histologic margins. Twenty-two patients underwent partial hepatectomy. The 30-day mortality rate was 7%. Projected survival is greater than 60 months in those with a negative histologic margin, with a median follow-up of 26 months. A presurgical T-staging system allows presurgical selection for therapy, predicts partial hepatectomy, and offers an index of prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: In half the patients, unresectability is mainly the result of intraabdominal metastases. Presurgical imaging predicts unresectability based on local extension but is poor for assessing nodal metastases. In one third of patients, disease can be resected for cure with a long median survival. Curative resection depends on negative margins, and hepatic resection is necessary to achieve this. The T-staging system correlates with resectability, the need for hepatectomy, and overall survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Khan, S. A., Thomas, H. C., Davidson, B. R., & Taylor-Robinson, S. D. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67530-7 · Cited by 1,042
Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study
Ortner, M. E. J., Caca, K., Berr, F., Liebetruth, J., Mansmann, U., Huster, D., Voderholzer, W., Schachschal, G., Mössner, J., & Lochs, H. (2003) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/j.gastro.2003.07.015 · Cited by 608
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FOR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA: RESULTS IN 207 PATIENTS1
Meyer, C. G., Penn, I., & James, L. (2000) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/00007890-200004270-00019 · Cited by 502
Abdalla, E. K. (2002) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.137.6.675 · Cited by 489
Ben-Josef, E., Guthrie, K. A., El-Khoueiry, A. B., Corless, C. L., Zalupski, M. M., Lowy, A. M., Thomas, C. R., Alberts, S. R., Dawson, L. A., Micetich, K. C., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.60.2219 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Burke, E. C., Jarnagin, W. R., Hochwald, S. N., Pisters, P. W. T., Fong, Y., & Blumgart, L. H.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 228
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 385-394
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026175981
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Patterns of Spread, the Importance of Hepatic Resection for Curative Operation, and a Presurgical Clinical Staging System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-199809000-00011
- The paper
- Burke, E. C., Jarnagin, W. R., Hochwald, S. N., Pisters, P. W. T., Fong, Y., & Blumgart, L. H. (1998). Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Patterns of Spread, the Importance of Hepatic Resection for Curative Operation, and a Presurgical Clinical Staging System. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199809000-00011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.