The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-Term Prognostic Significance of Extent of Rectal Cancer Response to Preoperative Radiation and Chemotherapy
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether selected clinicopathologic factors, including the extent of pathologic response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy (RT +/- chemo), have an impact on long-term recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer after optimal multimodality therapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although complete pathologic response to preoperative RT +/- chemo has been detected in up to 30% of rectal cancers, its significance on long-term outcome has not been widely reported. Previous retrospective studies evaluating clinical outcome in patients with complete or near-complete pathologic response documented good prognosis in this population but were limited by median follow-up in the range of 2 to 3 years. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with locally advanced (T(3-4) and/or N1) primary rectal cancer were prospectively identified. All were treated at one institution with preoperative RT to the pelvis (at least 4,500 cGy). Forty patients received concurrent preoperative 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and 27 received both pre- and postoperative chemotherapy. Patients underwent resection 4 to 7 weeks after completion of RT. TNM stage, angiolymphatic or perineural invasion, and extent of response to preoperative RT +/- chemo were determined by pathologic evaluation. Adverse pathologic features were defined as the presence of angiolymphatic and/or perineural invasion. RFS at 5 years was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 69 months, 5-year RFS was 79%. RFS was significantly worse for patients with aggressive pathologic features and positive nodal status identified in the postirradiated surgical specimen. Risk ratios for RFS were 3.68 for the presence of aggressive pathologic features and 4.64 for node-positive rectal cancers. In patients with greater than 95% rectal cancer response to preoperative RT +/- chemo, only one patient has died as a consequence of cancer, another has died of an unrelated cause, and the remainder were free of disease with a minimum follow-up of 47 months. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a marked response to preoperative RT +/- chemo may be associated with good long-term outcome but was not predictive of RFS. The presence of poor histopathologic features and positive nodal status are the most important prognostic indicators after neoadjuvant therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved Survival with Preoperative Radiotherapy in Resectable Rectal Cancer
(1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199704033361402 · Cited by 2,517
Cited by
Capirci, C., Valentini, V., Cionini, L., De Paoli, A., Rodel, C., Glynne-Jones, R., Coco, C., Romano, M., Mantello, G., Palazzi, S., et al. (2008) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12.019 · Cited by 445
Vecchio, F. M., Valentini, V., Minsky, B. D., Padula, G. D. A., Venkatraman, E. S., Balducci, M., Miccichè, F., Ricci, R., Morganti, A. G., Gambacorta, M. A., et al. (2005) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.017 · Cited by 423
Self-citationGuillem, J. G., Chessin, D. B., Cohen, A. M., Shia, J., Mazumdar, M., Enker, W., Paty, P. B., Weiser, M. R., Klimstra, D., Saltz, L., et al. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000161980.46459.96 · Cited by 386
Self-citationPan-Tumor Pathologic Scoring of Response to PD-(L)1 Blockade
Stein, J. E., Lipson, E. J., Cottrell, T. R., Forde, P. M., Anders, R. A., Cimino-Mathews, A., Thompson, E. D., Allaf, M. E., Yarchoan, M., Feliciano, J., et al. (2020) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-2379 · Cited by 177
“Chemotherapy scoring irPRC NSCLC (3, 10) Breast carcinoma (5, 27) Colorectal carcinoma (6, 33) Pan-tumor”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruo, L., Tickoo, S., Klimstra, D. S., Minsky, B. D., Saltz, L., Mazumdar, M., Paty, P. B., Wong, W. D., Larson, S. M., Cohen, A. M., & Guillem, J. G.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 236
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-81
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084330270
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Prognostic Significance of Extent of Rectal Cancer Response to Preoperative Radiation and Chemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-200207000-00012
- The paper
- Ruo, L., Tickoo, S., Klimstra, D. S., Minsky, B. D., Saltz, L., Mazumdar, M., Paty, P. B., Wong, W. D., Larson, S. M., Cohen, A. M., & Guillem, J. G. (2002). Long-Term Prognostic Significance of Extent of Rectal Cancer Response to Preoperative Radiation and Chemotherapy. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200207000-00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.