CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 211Face Recognition and PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Facial expression and selective attention

Vuilleumier, Patrik·2002·Current Opinion in Psychiatry
DOI 10.1097/00001504-200205000-00011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent findings demonstrate that faces with an emotional expression tend to attract attention more than neutral faces, especially when having some threat-related value (anger or fear). These findings suggest that discrimination of emotional cues in faces can at least partly be extracted at preattentive or unconscious stages of processing, and then serve to enhance awareness and behavioural responses toward emotionally relevant stimuli. Functional neuroimaging results have begun to delineate brain regions whose response to threat-related expressions is independent of voluntary attention (e.g. amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex), and other regions whose response occurs only with attention (e.g. superior temporal and anterior cingulate cortex). Moreover, visual responses in the fusiform cortex are enhanced for emotional faces, consistent with their greater perceptual saliency. Recent data from event-related evoked potentials and neurophysiology also suggest that rapid processing of emotional information may not only occur in parallel to, but promote a more detailed perceptual analysis of, sensory inputs and thus bias competition for attention toward the representation of emotionally salient stimuli.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001504-200205000-00011

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. van Honk, 2001, Cognition Emotion, 15, 279, 10.1080/0269993004200222 · DOI
  2. Mikhailova, 2000, Neurosci Behav Physiol, 49, 566
  3. Yiend, 2001, Q J Exp Psychol A, 54, 665, 10.1080/02724980042000462 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–210 of 210

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Vuilleumier, P.
Affiliations
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
Corresponding author
Vuilleumier, Patrik
ORCID
Vuilleumier, Patrik
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2002-05
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
291-300
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/00001504-200205000-00011
OpenAlex
W2086530114
Cited by
211
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
facial expressions, emotional facial expressions, selective attention, anger, fear, preattentive processing, amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, superior temporal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, fusiform cortex, perceptual salience, attentional bias, event-related potentials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review