Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The treatment of spontaneous carotid and vertebral artery dissections

Schievink, Wouter I.·2000·Current Opinion in Cardiology

Abstract

Spontaneous dissections of the carotid and vertebral arteries in the neck are a common cause of stroke in young and middle-aged people. Moreover, they are increasingly recognized as the cause of a wide variety of other, more subtle, neurologic signs and symptoms. The cause of these arterial dissections largely remains unexplained but probably involves a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Magnetic resonance imaging has largely surpassed angiography as the imaging study of choice. The treatment of carotid and vertebral artery dissections is based on rather incomplete evidence. Anticoagulation with heparin followed by warfarin remains the treatment of choice in most major medical centers and is supported by the demonstration of emboli as the most common cause of stroke in these patients. The burgeoning interest in endovascular techniques has resulted in many patients being treated for carotid and vertebral artery dissections with percutaneous angioplasty and stent deployment. Although the treatment of dissections is generally well tolerated and the radiographic results are impressive, most dissections heal spontaneously and the associated aneurysms never rupture and rarely cause delayed ischemic symptoms. Surgical treatment of dissections, consisting of an in situ interposition graft or extracranial-intracranial bypass, is indicated only for those patients with persistent symptoms refractory to maximal medical therapy who are not candidates for endovascular treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001573-200009000-00002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Schievink, W. I.
Venue
Current Opinion in Cardiology
Published
2000-09
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
316-321
ISSN
0268-4705 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015136190
Cited by
161
References
0
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The treatment of spontaneous carotid and vertebral artery dissections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00001573-200009000-00002
The paper
Schievink, W. I. (2000). The treatment of spontaneous carotid and vertebral artery dissections. Current Opinion in Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001573-200009000-00002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.