The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The treatment of spontaneous carotid and vertebral artery dissections
Abstract
Spontaneous dissections of the carotid and vertebral arteries in the neck are a common cause of stroke in young and middle-aged people. Moreover, they are increasingly recognized as the cause of a wide variety of other, more subtle, neurologic signs and symptoms. The cause of these arterial dissections largely remains unexplained but probably involves a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Magnetic resonance imaging has largely surpassed angiography as the imaging study of choice. The treatment of carotid and vertebral artery dissections is based on rather incomplete evidence. Anticoagulation with heparin followed by warfarin remains the treatment of choice in most major medical centers and is supported by the demonstration of emboli as the most common cause of stroke in these patients. The burgeoning interest in endovascular techniques has resulted in many patients being treated for carotid and vertebral artery dissections with percutaneous angioplasty and stent deployment. Although the treatment of dissections is generally well tolerated and the radiographic results are impressive, most dissections heal spontaneously and the associated aneurysms never rupture and rarely cause delayed ischemic symptoms. Surgical treatment of dissections, consisting of an in situ interposition graft or extracranial-intracranial bypass, is indicated only for those patients with persistent symptoms refractory to maximal medical therapy who are not candidates for endovascular treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sacco, R. L., Adams, R., Albers, G., Alberts, M. J., Benavente, O., Furie, K., Goldstein, L. B., Gorelick, P., Halperin, J., Harbaugh, R., et al. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000199147.30016.74 · Cited by 1,873
Cervical artery dissection?clinical features, risk factors, therapy and outcome in 126 patients
Dziewas, R., Konrad, C., Dr�ger, B., Evers, S., Besselmann, M., L�demann, P., Kuhlenb�umer, G., St�gbauer, F., & Ringelstein, E. B. (2003) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-003-0174-5 · Cited by 391
Cervical Arterial Dissection: Time for a Therapeutic Trial?
Beletsky, V., Nadareishvili, Z., Lynch, J., Shuaib, A., Woolfenden, A., & Norris, J. W. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000098649.39767.bc · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Schievink, W. I.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Cardiology
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 316-321
- ISSN
- 0268-4705 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015136190
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The treatment of spontaneous carotid and vertebral artery dissections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00001573-200009000-00002
- The paper
- Schievink, W. I. (2000). The treatment of spontaneous carotid and vertebral artery dissections. Current Opinion in Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001573-200009000-00002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.