The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Body Mass Definitions of Obesity: Sensitivity and Specificity Using Self-Reported Weight and Height
Abstract
A high correlation between continuous measures of self-reported and measured weight and height has led investigators to infer that self-report of these variables is appropriate in epidemiologic studies. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of categorical definitions of body mass defined using self-reported height and weight on 7,455 adult participants of the Lipid Research Clinics Family Study (1975-1978) on whom both self-reported and measured height and weight were available. The categorical definition of obesity used here was a body mass index of at least 30 kg/m2. Overall, the sensitivity of the obese category when defined with self-reported weight and height was 74% (95% CI = 72%-76%), and the specificity was 99%. The sensitivities of the categories defined using self-reported measures varied considerably by sex, age, and educational level. Overall, the sensitivities were higher for women compared with men, as men were less accurate in reporting height. The sensitivity of the categorical definitions of obesity decreased with increasing age and education in both men and women. The sensitivity for elderly obese men was below 50%. These results suggest that substantial misclassification can occur when self-reported information is used to define body mass categories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE EFFECT OF MISCLASSIFICATION IN THE PRESENCE OF COVARIATES
GREENLAND, S. (1980) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113025 · Cited by 494
Cited by
Gorber, S. C., Tremblay, M., Moher, D., & Gorber, B. (2007) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2007.00347.x · Cited by 1,945
Ogden, C. L., Yanovski, S. Z., Carroll, M. D., & Flegal, K. M. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.052 · Cited by 1,561
Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC–Oxford participants
Spencer, E. A., Appleby, P. N., Davey, G. K., & Key, T. J. (2002) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2001322 · Cited by 1,082
Effects of Age on Validity of Self-Reported Height, Weight, and Body Mass Index
KUCZMARSKI, M. F., KUCZMARSKI, R. J., & NAJJAR, M. (2001) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(01)00008-6 · Cited by 965
Embodiment: a conceptual glossary for epidemiology
Krieger, N. (2005) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2004.024562 · Cited by 964
Metadata
- Authors
- Nieto-García, F. J., Bush, T. L., & Keyl, P. M.
- Venue
- Epidemiology
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 146-152
- ISSN
- 1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050087677
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.