Cited by 46Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Outcome Analysis for Correction of Single Suture Craniosynostosis Using Resorbable Fixation

Losken, Albert, Williams, J. Kerwin, Burstein, Fernando D., Cohen, Steven R., Hudgins, Roger, Boydston, William, Reisner, Andrew, Simms, Catherine·2001·Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract

A retrospective review was performed on 63 patients at Childrens Healthcare of Atlanta at Scottish Rite who underwent correction of single-suture craniosynostosis using a resorbable fixation system. Included in the series were 24 patients with metopic synostosis, 15 with sagittal synostosis, and 24 with unicoronal synostosis. The average age at operation was 22.7 months (range: 2.8 months-18 years), and mean follow-up time was 30.7 months (range: 7.1-10 years). Reoperation equal to or exceeding the magnitude of the original procedure occurred in 4.76% of the patients. This was comparable to the reoperation rate observed at our institution using traditional fixation systems. Minor complications related to the use of resorbable plates were also identified, and the final outcome for single-suture synostosis was favorable. Results suggest that resorbable plates and screws are as effective as titanium-based systems in the treatment of single-suture synostosis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001665-200109000-00009

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 46

Metadata

Authors
Losken, A., Williams, J. K., Burstein, F. D., Cohen, S. R., Hudgins, R., Boydston, W., Reisner, A., & Simms, C.
Affiliations
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, J. Kerwin
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2001-09
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
451-455
ISSN
1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014542720
Cited by
46
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
single-suture craniosynostosis, metopic synostosis, sagittal synostosis, unicoronal synostosis, reoperation rate, surgical complications, pediatric craniofacial surgery
MeSH terms
Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer, Adolescent, Biocompatible Materials, Bone Plates, Bone Screws, Child, Child, Preschool, Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Polyglycolic Acid, Polymers, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Titanium, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, Lactic Acid, Absorbable Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review