Cited by 4Facial Trauma and Fracture ManagementReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

C-Shape Extended Transconjunctival Approach for the Exposure and Osteotomy of Traumatic Orbitozygomaticomaxillary Deformities

Abstract

In the treatment of post-traumatic deformities of the orbitozygomaticomaxillary complex resulting from trauma, the most appropriate exposure must be used. The choice of exposures includes the bicoronal approach and the periorbital incisions. When the whole orbitozygomatic complex is malpositioned, the bicoronal approach is desirable; this can be combined with buccal and eyelid incisions. However, the bicoronal approach is complicated by a longer duration of operation time, post-surgical scars that tend to show, and potential damage to the temporal branch of the facial nerve. A new approach using a C-shape extended transconjunctival approach is possible to have one field of vision to osteotomize the frontozygomatic suture, the lateral orbital wall, inferior orbital rim, lateral maxillary buttress, and zygomatic arch. It takes less operating time and the post-surgical scars are shorter than the bicoronal approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001665-200111000-00020

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 3 · Cited by 4

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Tessier, 1973, J Maxillofac Surg, 1, 3, 10.1016/S0301-0503(73)80005-0 · DOI
  2. Gruss, 1990, Plast Reconsr Surg, 85, 878, 10.1097/00006534-199006000-00008 · DOI
  3. Guyuron, 1989, J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 17, 101, 10.1016/S1010-5182(89)80079-4 · DOI
  4. Heimberger, 1991, Neuroradiology, 33, 634

Metadata

Authors
Uemura, T., Jinnai, T., Yokoyama, T., Mitsukawa, N., & Yoshikawa, A.
Affiliations
  • Saga University (JP)
  • St Mary's Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Uemura, Tetsuji
  • Jinnai, Takao
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2001-11
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
603-607
ISSN
1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085360541
Cited by
4
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Keywords
bicoronal approach, facial nerve injury, surgical exposure, postoperative scar
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adolescent, Adult, Bone Plates, Cicatrix, Conjunctiva, Dissection, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Maxilla, Maxillary Fractures, Orbit, Orbital Fractures, Osteotomy, Time Factors, Zygoma, Zygomatic Fractures, Bone Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review