The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Otoplasty in Children Less Than Four Years of Age: Surgical Technique
Abstract
The appropriate age for otoplasty remains controversial. Most surgeons wait until the child is aged 5 years or older to perform otoplasty. In this article, the results are reported in a series of 12 patients in whom otoplasty was performed before the age of 4 years. The approach used consists of a logical sequence for recreation of the antihelical fold, conchal reduction, reduction of the conchomastoid angle, and lobule setback. Follow-up in these patients ranges from 1 to 7 years, with a median follow-up interval of 3 years. No auricular growth disturbances were noted as a result of the surgery. Recurrent auricular prominence was noted in only 1 (8%) of the 12 patients, comprising 4.8% of the operated ears. Experience using this approach demonstrates that otoplasty can be performed from the age of 9 months or older with safety, reliability, and a high level of satisfaction on the part of the affected families.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although ear growth is nearly complete by age 6, procedures before age 4 may not disrupt development due to softer cartilage.41,69”
From Otoplasty Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes: A Practical Review (2026) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cites
The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures
Mustardé, J. C. (1963) · British Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0007-1226(63)80100-9 · Cited by 426
Correction of prominent ears by concha-mastoid sutures
FURNAS, D. W. (1968) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-196809000-00001 · Cited by 329
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Spira, 1999, Plast Reconst Surg, 104, 834, 10.1097/00006534-199909010-00038 · DOI
- Huang, 1995, Plast Surg Forum, 18, 261
- Gosain, 2000, Plast Surg Forum, 23, 267
- Baker, 1979, Aesthetic Plast Surg, 3, 29, 10.1007/BF01577834 · DOI
- McDowell, 1968, Plast Reconst Surg, 41, 17, 10.1097/00006534-196801000-00004 · DOI
- Stark, 1962, Br J Plast Surg, 15, 385, 10.1016/S0007-1226(62)80063-0 · DOI
- Tan, 1986, Br J Plast Surg, 39, 270, 10.1016/0007-1226(86)90100-1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Otoplasty Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes: A Practical Review
Kaleeny, J. D., & Janis, J. E. (2026) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000007404
“41 Animal studies have driven minimally invasive oto-plasty.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Gosain, A. K., & Recinos, R. F.
- Affiliations
- Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gosain, Arun K.
- ORCID
- Gosain, Arun K.
- Venue
- Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 505-509
- ISSN
- 1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999315733
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Keywords
- otoplasty, pediatric otoplasty, timing of surgery, ear deformity
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Cartilage, Child, Preschool, Ear, External, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Recurrence, Safety, Suture Techniques, Reproducibility of Results, Patient Satisfaction, Plastic Surgery Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review