Cited by 31Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Otoplasty in Children Less Than Four Years of Age: Surgical Technique

Gosain, Arun K., Recinos, René F.·2002·Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract

The appropriate age for otoplasty remains controversial. Most surgeons wait until the child is aged 5 years or older to perform otoplasty. In this article, the results are reported in a series of 12 patients in whom otoplasty was performed before the age of 4 years. The approach used consists of a logical sequence for recreation of the antihelical fold, conchal reduction, reduction of the conchomastoid angle, and lobule setback. Follow-up in these patients ranges from 1 to 7 years, with a median follow-up interval of 3 years. No auricular growth disturbances were noted as a result of the surgery. Recurrent auricular prominence was noted in only 1 (8%) of the 12 patients, comprising 4.8% of the operated ears. Experience using this approach demonstrates that otoplasty can be performed from the age of 9 months or older with safety, reliability, and a high level of satisfaction on the part of the affected families.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001665-200207000-00005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Spira, 1999, Plast Reconst Surg, 104, 834, 10.1097/00006534-199909010-00038 · DOI
  2. Huang, 1995, Plast Surg Forum, 18, 261
  3. Gosain, 2000, Plast Surg Forum, 23, 267
  4. Baker, 1979, Aesthetic Plast Surg, 3, 29, 10.1007/BF01577834 · DOI
  5. McDowell, 1968, Plast Reconst Surg, 41, 17, 10.1097/00006534-196801000-00004 · DOI
  6. Stark, 1962, Br J Plast Surg, 15, 385, 10.1016/S0007-1226(62)80063-0 · DOI
  7. Tan, 1986, Br J Plast Surg, 39, 270, 10.1016/0007-1226(86)90100-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 31

Metadata

Authors
Gosain, A. K., & Recinos, R. F.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Corresponding author
Gosain, Arun K.
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2002-07
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
505-509
ISSN
1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999315733
Cited by
31
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
otoplasty, pediatric otoplasty, timing of surgery, ear deformity
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Cartilage, Child, Preschool, Ear, External, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Recurrence, Safety, Suture Techniques, Reproducibility of Results, Patient Satisfaction, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review