Acquired haemophilia A: errors in the diagnosis
Abstract
The distinction between a specific factor inactivator and a non-specific inhibitor is important when confronted by a patient with a history of bleeding and abnormal in-vitro coagulation tests. We report on two patients who presented with bleeding and a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time. Initial factor assays suggested combined deficiency of factors VIII and IX as a result of the presence of inactivators. The use of dilution studies, chromogenic assays, a novel in-house enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay-based technique and phospholipid neutralization, demonstrated that Case 1 had a genuine factor VIII inactivator resulting in factor VIII levels of less than 1 IU/dl but no factor IX deficiency. Case 2 had normal levels of factor VIII on further testing and no specific inactivator to either factor VIII or IX but a potent antiphospholipid antibody which had interfered with the phospholipid-dependent in-vitro assays. Care must be taken in the interpretation of laboratory assays in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies to ensure that the correct diagnosis is made and inappropriate treatment avoided.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other coagulation assays that use aPTT-based methods may show interference due to LA presence, resulting in falsely low factor activity.
“Other coagulation assays that use aPTT-based methods, as one stage measurement (OSA) [90] for factors VIII, IX, XI, and XII, may show interference due to LA presence, resulting in falsely low factor activity [91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98].”
From Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass (2023) · cites this paper as [95]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Orellana, D., & Kershaw, G. (2013) · Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1336832 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Tripodi, A., Mancuso, M. E., Chantarangkul, V., Clerici, M., Bader, R., Meroni, P. L., Santagostino, E., & Mannucci, P. M. (2005) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2005.054312 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass
Molinari, A. C., Martini, T., Banov, L., Ierardi, A., Leotta, M., Strangio, A., & Santoro, R. C. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12206654 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Nevertheless, a very low or undetectable factor activity, without non-parallelism, has been reported in several cases [95,97–99]: these effects can be seen in all OSA factor assays and pose the problem of differential diagnosis with both a multiple factor deficiency and a factor-specific inhibitor.”
Background
- Authors
- Kazmi, M. A., Pickering, W., Smith, M. P., Holland, L. J., & Savidge, G. F.
- Affiliations
- St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
- ORCID
- Smith, M. P.
- Venue
- Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 623-628
- ISSN
- 0957-5235 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987618842
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hemophilia Treatment and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Platelet Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Keywords
- acquired hemophilia A, antiphospholipid antibodies, hemorrhage, activated partial thromboplastin time, hemophilia A, hemophilia B, chromogenic assay, coagulation tests
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Diagnosis, Differential, Factor IX, Factor VIII, Female, Hemophilia A, Humans, Immunoassay, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review