Cited by 36Hemophilia Treatment and ResearchPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Acquired haemophilia A: errors in the diagnosis

Kazmi, M. A., Pickering, W., Smith, M. P., Holland, L. J., Savidge, G. F.·1998·Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis

Abstract

The distinction between a specific factor inactivator and a non-specific inhibitor is important when confronted by a patient with a history of bleeding and abnormal in-vitro coagulation tests. We report on two patients who presented with bleeding and a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time. Initial factor assays suggested combined deficiency of factors VIII and IX as a result of the presence of inactivators. The use of dilution studies, chromogenic assays, a novel in-house enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay-based technique and phospholipid neutralization, demonstrated that Case 1 had a genuine factor VIII inactivator resulting in factor VIII levels of less than 1 IU/dl but no factor IX deficiency. Case 2 had normal levels of factor VIII on further testing and no specific inactivator to either factor VIII or IX but a potent antiphospholipid antibody which had interfered with the phospholipid-dependent in-vitro assays. Care must be taken in the interpretation of laboratory assays in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies to ensure that the correct diagnosis is made and inappropriate treatment avoided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001721-199810000-00009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other coagulation assays that use aPTT-based methods may show interference due to LA presence, resulting in falsely low factor activity.

    “Other coagulation assays that use aPTT-based methods, as one stage measurement (OSA) [90] for factors VIII, IX, XI, and XII, may show interference due to LA presence, resulting in falsely low factor activity [91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98].”

    From Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass (2023) · cites this paper as [95]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kazmi, M. A., Pickering, W., Smith, M. P., Holland, L. J., & Savidge, G. F.
Affiliations
St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Venue
Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis
Published
1998-10
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
623-628
ISSN
0957-5235 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987618842
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hemophilia Treatment and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Platelet Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
acquired hemophilia A, antiphospholipid antibodies, hemorrhage, activated partial thromboplastin time, hemophilia A, hemophilia B, chromogenic assay, coagulation tests
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Diagnosis, Differential, Factor IX, Factor VIII, Female, Hemophilia A, Humans, Immunoassay, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review