The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ranking of P-glycoprotein substrates and inhibitors by a calcein-AM fluorometry screening assay
Open accessAbstract
In order to compare the capacities of a variety of compounds to interfere with P-glycoprotein (Pgp) function, a novel assay was set up to work on a large screening scale. The model assay measures the capacity of parental sensitive (Par) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) cells to efflux a small fixed amount of acetoxymethyl calcein (calcein-AM) after their pretreatment with concentration ranges of known Pgp modulators. This microplate cytometry-based assay was performed with two different pairs of cell lines, the human lymphocytic leukemia CEM cells and the murine monocytic leukemia P388 cells. For a given Pgp-expressing MDR cell line, a Pgp modulator EC50 was defined as the concentration required to restore half of the calcein retention shown by similarly treated Par cells. With both MDR-P388 and MDR-CEM cells, EC50 comparisons ranked five reference Pgp modulators as follows: SDZ 280-446 > SDZ PSC 833 > cyclosporin A > verapamil > vinblastine. Further use of the MDR-CEM cells could rank 15 Pgp modulators for their capacity to interfere with calcein-AM efflux as follows: SDZ 280-446 1.9 x > SDZ PSC 833 8.3 x > cyclosporin A 3.8 x > amiodarone 1.1 x > quinacrine 1.6 x > verapamil 1.4 x > quinidine 1.1 x > vinblastine 11 x > vincristine 2 x > chloroquine > beta-lumicolchicine > or = gamma-lumicolchicine > or = colchicine > etoposide > or = doxorubicin. This calcein-AM assay should open the way for ranking large numbers of novel structures for their potential Pgp modulator properties, particularly for an efficient screening of Pgp function antagonists, but it does not allow defining whether their inhibition may be competitive or not.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Impact of Drug Transporter Studies on Drug Discovery and Development
Mizuno, N., Niwa, T., Yotsumoto, Y., & Sugiyama, Y. (2003) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.55.3.1 · Cited by 490
Deletion of a mycobacterial divisome factor collapses single-cell phenotypic heterogeneity
Rego, E. H., Audette, R. E., & Rubin, E. J. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22361 · Cited by 186
Nixon, M., Mackenzie, S. D., Taylor, A. I., Homer, N. Z. M., Livingstone, D. E., Mouras, R., Morgan, R. A., Mole, D. J., Stimson, R. H., Reynolds, R. M., et al. (2016) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf9074 · Cited by 59
Ansbro, M. R., Shukla, S., Ambudkar, S. V., Yuspa, S. H., & Li, L. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060334 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Tiberghien, F., & Loor, F.
- Venue
- Anti-Cancer Drugs
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 568-578
- ISSN
- 0959-4973 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082437431
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ranking of P-glycoprotein substrates and inhibitors by a calcein-AM fluorometry screening assay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00001813-199607000-00012
- The paper
- Tiberghien, F., & Loor, F. (1996). Ranking of P-glycoprotein substrates and inhibitors by a calcein-AM fluorometry screening assay. Anti-Cancer Drugs. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001813-199607000-00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.