The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toward independent learning: curricular design for assisting students to learn how to learn
Abstract
It must be acknowledged that a university course in medicine cannot hope to present its students with everything they need to know in order to practice a lifetime's career in the profession. Even were the course years longer, increasing the content of factual knowledge would not equip the graduate for the practice of medicine. In part this is due to the fact that medical knowledge is continually changing or being reevaluated; in addition, facts alone cannot be correlated with practical application, and the process of how to use the facts is an essential part of the study and practice of medicine. It is essential, therefore, that an undergraduate medical course, among other things, teach the students to take responsibility for and to be able to structure their own learning. If the process of continual active learning is fostered during undergraduate days, it may readily be continued by the graduate alone in the absence of his teachers. The curriculum at the new medical school at Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia, is being developed with this priority in view. This paper describes some of the principles underpinning this philosophy and how such principles are being applied.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“But this strategy may backfire, according to Neame and Powis, because the structure and frequency of examinations in the a medical school curriculum “may inhibit even the most self-confident and independent student from learning his own way” 19 .”
From Effect of repeated/spaced formative assessments on medical school final exam performance (2017) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impact of an evidence-based medicine curriculum based on adult learning theory
Green, M. L., & Ellis, P. J. (1997) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07159.x · Cited by 196
More than mere games: a review of card and board games for medical education
Bochennek, K., Wittekindt, B., Zimmermann, S. Y., & Klingebiel, T. E. (2007) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590701749813 · Cited by 196
“Card and board games–defined by the game layout– improve communicative skills and promote active learning through interaction with other players (Neame & Powis 1981; Richardson & Birge 1995).”
BackgroundThe problem-based learning tutor: Teacher? Facilitator? Evaluator?
Neville, A. J. (1999) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421599979338 · Cited by 155
Student Learning Research: Retrospect and Prospect
Ramsden, P. (1985) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/0729436850040104 · Cited by 137
Problem-based learning: a pedagogy for using case material in accounting education
Milne, M. J., & McConnell, P. (2001) · Accounting Education · doi:10.1080/09639280122712 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Neame, R. L., & Powis, D. A.
- ORCID
- Powis, D A
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1981-11
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 886-93
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975713018
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Keywords
- self-directed learning, medical education, undergraduate medical curriculum, active learning, lifelong learning, medical knowledge updating, clinical reasoning
- MeSH terms
- Curriculum, Education, Medical, Humans, Learning, Schools, Medical, Self-Evaluation Programs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review