Cited by 18Innovations in Medical EducationEvaluation of Teaching PracticesHealth and Medical Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How medical students learn

Open access
Vu, N V, Galofre, A·1983·Academic Medicine

Abstract

With recent concerns over and attempts to address issues regarding medical students' processes of learning and development of lifelong learning habits, a question often asked is: How do medical students learn in the present medical curriculum? In this study, the authors directly attempt to answer that question--they assess the learning behaviors of 254 students in two medical schools, one with an objectives-based mastery and one with a traditional curricula, and discuss whether the students' adopted behaviors are conducive to the development of effective, analytic, and independent learning. Most students of both medical schools reported very similar effective and ineffective learning behaviors. The students' behaviors were found to dispose them more to analytic learning than to independent learning. Suggestions to restructure the curriculum for better development of students' independent learning habits are proposed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001888-198308000-00001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Vu, N. V., & Galofre, A.
ORCID
Vu, N V
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
1983-08
Volume
58
Issue
8
Pages
601-10
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977376962
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
medical students, learning behavior, self-directed learning, lifelong learning, medical curriculum, traditional curriculum, curriculum redesign
MeSH terms
Behavior, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Learning, Psychological Tests, Science, Students, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review