The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A new program to enhance the teaching and assessment of clinical skills in the Peopleʼs Republic of China
Abstract
The authors describe the history and current state of development of an ongoing and still-evolving collaboration--between three Chinese medical schools, the China Medical Board of New York, Inc. (CMB), and one of the authors (PLS) and her staff at the University of Massachusetts Medical School--to enhance the teaching and assessment of clinical skills in the schools. The program grew out of a request by the three schools to the CMB for assistance in improving their process of evaluating students. Its goal is to develop a uniform and comprehensive course for teaching and assessing basic clinical skills. Standardized patients are also being used as instructors and evaluators. The program is co-sponsored by the three schools and the CMB. Background is given about the CMB, its involvement in Chinese medical education, and its American perspective on the nature of education in Chinese institutions of modern medicine and the factors that can assist and impede educational change. The authors present the mechanisms of the program, the benefits that have occurred so far, and the problems encountered in creating the model curriculum to teach clinical skills that is now being implemented by the three schools. Future plans are outlined, including the hope that the three schools will serve as a resource and disseminate some or all aspects of the new approach to similar medical schools in China, and that the program can serve as a model for implementation of similar programs in other countries.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This limitation hinders the enhancement of students’ medical history taking abilities9.”
From A large language model digital patient system enhances ophthalmology history taking skills (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A large language model digital patient system enhances ophthalmology history taking skills
Luo, M.-J., Bi, S., Pang, J., Liu, L., Tsui, C.-K., Lai, Y., Chen, W., Yang, Y., Xu, K., Zhao, L., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01841-6 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Stillman, P. L., & Sawyer, W. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 495-9
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007619687
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Keywords
- clinical skills training, clinical skills assessment, standardized patients, medical curriculum, China, curriculum development
- MeSH terms
- China, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Educational Measurement, Schools, Medical, Teaching, United States, Program Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review