The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sexual negotiation in the AIDS era: negotiated safety revisited
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the safety of the 'negotiated safety' strategy-the strategy of dispensing with condoms within HIV-seronegative concordant regular sexual relationships under certain conditions. METHOD: Data from recently recruited cohort of homosexually active men (Sydney Men and Sexual Health cohort, n = 1037) are used to revisit negotiated safety. The men were surveyed using a structured questionnaire and questions addressing their sexual relationships and practice their own and their regular partner's serostatus, agreements entered into by the men concerning sexual practice within and outside their regular relationship, and contextual and demographic variables. RESULTS: The findings indicate that a significant number of men used negotiated safety as an HIV prevention strategy. In the 6 months prior to interview, of the 181 men in seroconcordant HIV-negative regular relationships, 62% had engaged in unprotected anal intercourse within their relationship, and 91% (165 men) had not engaged in unprotected anal intercourse outside their relationship. Of these 165 men, 82% had negotiated agreements about sex outside their relationship. The safety of negotiation was dependent not only on seroconcordance but also on the presence of an agreement; 82% of the men who had not engaged in unprotected anal intercourse outside their regular relationship had entered into an agreement with their partner, whereas only 56% of those who had engaged in unprotected anal intercourse had an agreement. The safety of negotiation was also related to the nature of the safety agreement reached between the men and on the acceptability of condoms. Agreements between HIV-negative seroconcordant regular partners prohibiting anal intercourse with casual partners or any form of sex with a casual partner were typically complied with, and men who had such negotiated agreements were at low risk of HIV infection. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of the strategy of negotiated safety among men in HIV-seronegative regular relationships may help such men sustain the safety of their sexual practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249 · Cited by 3,732
If suicide is a public health problem, what are we doing to prevent it?
Knox, K. L., Conwell, Y., & Caine, E. D. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.1.37 · Cited by 300
Comprehensive clinical care for men who have sex with men: an integrated approach.
Mayer, K. H., Bekker, L.-G., Stall, R., Grulich, A. E., Colfax, G., & Lama, J. R. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60835-6 · Cited by 167
Confronting Rising STIs in the Era of PrEP and Treatment as Prevention
Ramchandani, M. S., & Golden, M. R. (2019) · Current HIV/AIDS Reports · doi:10.1007/s11904-019-00446-5 · Cited by 84
Lightfoot, M., Song, J., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., & Newman, P. (2005) · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · doi:10.1097/00126334-200501010-00012 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Kippax, S., Noble, J., Prestage, G., Crawford, J. M., Campbell, D., Baxter, D., & Cooper, D.
- Venue
- AIDS
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 191-197
- ISSN
- 0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999805679
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual negotiation in the AIDS era: negotiated safety revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00002030-199702000-00009
- The paper
- Kippax, S., Noble, J., Prestage, G., Crawford, J. M., Campbell, D., Baxter, D., & Cooper, D. (1997). Sexual negotiation in the AIDS era: negotiated safety revisited. AIDS. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-199702000-00009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.