Cited by 143Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Placebo Effect

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Does Anxiety Affect Coping with Chronic Pain?

MCCRACKEN, LANCE M., GROSS, RICHARD T.·1993·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

Objective To evaluate whether symptoms of emotional distress related to pain affect patients' use of pain coping strategies. Relations between anxiety responses, as assessed by the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale, and coping strategies, as assessed by the Coping Strategies Questionnaire, were examined. Design Cross-sectional, retrospective, correlational. Setting A multidisciplinary pain management clinic in a university hospital. Participants One hundred sixty-five patients (49.7% female) with chronic pain complaints. The most frequent complaint was low back pain (73%). Average age was 45.3 years (SD = 13.8). Main outcome measures Pain coping strategy scores and ratings of ability to control and decrease pain. Results Generally, cognitive anxiety was associated with less overall coping with pain, whereas physiological anxiety was associated with a greater coping with pain. Escape and avoidance anxiety responses were associated with greater use of overt pain behaviors for coping. Regression analyses indicated that anxiety symptoms combined across cognitive, motoric, and physiological response types accounted for significant variance in seven of eight coping strategy scores. These analyses also revealed significant unique relations of separate anxiety modalities with coping variables. Relations between anxiety scores and the Catastrophizing subscale of the CSQ were much greater than the relations of anxiety scores with other coping variables, suggesting that catastrophizing may be…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002508-199312000-00006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
MCCRACKEN, L. M., & GROSS, R. T.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
1993-12
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
253-259
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094180094
Cited by
143
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
chronic pain, anxiety, pain coping, cognitive anxiety, physiological anxiety, escape-avoidance, catastrophizing, emotional distress, low back pain, Coping Strategies Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Chronic Disease, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review