Complex Regional Pain Syndromes: Guidelines for Therapy
Abstract
This report aims to present an orderly approach to the treatment of Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) types I and II through an algorithm. The central theme is functional restoration: a coordinated but progressive approach that introduces each of the treatment modalities needed to achieve both remission and rehabilitation. Reaching objective and measurable rehabilitation goals is an essential element. Specific exercise therapy to reestablish function after musculoskeletal injury is central to this functional restoration. Its application to CRPS is more contingent on varying rates of progress that characterize the restoration of function in patients with CRPS. Also, the various modalities that may be used, including analgesia by pharmacologic means or regional anesthesia or the use of neuromodulation, behavioral management, and the qualitatively different approaches that are unique to the management of children with CRPS, are provided only to facilitate functional improvement in a stepwise but methodical manner. Patients with CRPS need an individual approach that requires extreme flexibility. This distinguishes the management of these conditions from other well-described medical conditions having a known pathophysiology. In particular, the special biopsychosocial factors that are critical to achieving a successful outcome are emphasized. This algorithm is a departure from the contemporary heterogeneous approach to treatment of patients with CRPS. The underlying principles are motivation, mobilization, and desensitization facilitated by the relief of pain and the use of pharmacologic and interventional procedures to treat specific signs and symptoms. Self-management techniques are emphasized, and functional rehabilitation is the key to the success of this algorithm.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Motor actions aggravate limb pain, leading to avoidance of movement, disuse of the affected extremity, and attention directed towards signals of pain exacerbation.
“leading to avoidance of movement, disuse of the affected extremity, and attention directed towards signals of pain exacerbation [5, 9, 10].”
From Symptom reduction and improved function in chronic CRPS type 1 after 12-week integrated, interdisciplinary therapy (2019) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 378
- Authors
- Stanton-Hicks, M., Baron, R., Boas, R., Gordh, T., Harden, N., Hendler, N., Koltzenburg, M., Raj, P., & Wilder, R.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stanton-Hicks, Michael
- Venue
- The Clinical Journal of Pain
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-166
- ISSN
- 0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996217901
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- complex regional pain syndrome, CRPS type I, CRPS type II, treatment algorithm, functional restoration, rehabilitation, exercise therapy, regional anesthesia, neuromodulation, behavior management, pediatric CRPS, biopsychosocial factors, self-management, pain management
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Causalgia, Humans, Pain, Palliative Care, Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy, Syndrome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review