Cited by 7Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

DIFFERENTIAL INFLUENCE OF DOPAMINERGIC AND NORADRENERGIC AFFERENTS ON THEIR TARGET CELLS IN THE RAT PREFRONTAL CORTEX

THIERRY, A. M., GODBOUT, R., MANTZ, J., PIROT, S., GLOWINSKI, J.·1992·Clinical Neuropharmacology

Abstract

INSERM U114, Chaire de Neuropharmacologie, Collège de France, 11 place Marcelin Berthelot, 75231 PARIS, France.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002826-199201001-00075

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
THIERRY, A. M., GODBOUT, R., MANTZ, J., PIROT, S., & GLOWINSKI, J.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Collège de France (FR)
Venue
Clinical Neuropharmacology
Published
1992
Volume
15
Pages
139A-140A
ISSN
0362-5664 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2314424336
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
dopaminergic afferents, noradrenergic afferents, prefrontal cortex, neurotransmitter interactions, target cells, norepinephrine, dopamine
MeSH terms
Animals, Dopamine, Electric Stimulation, Frontal Lobe, Locus Coeruleus, Neurons, Afferent, Norepinephrine, Tegmentum Mesencephali, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review