Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 606

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Forces at the Glenohumeral Joint in Abduction

POPPEN, N. K., WALKER, P. S.·1978·Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the forces in the glenohumeral joint for isometric abduction (including all directions of rotation) in the plane of the scapula. The lines of actions of muscles were obtained from 3 upper quarter specimens, electromyographic data was used, as well as geometrical parameters of shoulder motion. The main assumption made in the analysis was that the force in a muscle was proportional to its area times the integrated electromyographic signal. The resultant force reached a maximum of 0.89 times body weight at 90 degrees of abduction, while the shearing component up the face of the glenoid was a maximum of 0.42 times body weight at 60 degrees of abduction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00003086-197809000-00035

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 606

Metadata

Authors
POPPEN, N. K., & WALKER, P. S.
Venue
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Published
1978-09
Volume
135
Issue
135
Pages
165-170
ISSN
0009-921X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4327847082
Cited by
606
References
0
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Forces at the Glenohumeral Joint in Abduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003086-197809000-00035
The paper
POPPEN, N. K., & WALKER, P. S. (1978). Forces at the Glenohumeral Joint in Abduction. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197809000-00035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.