The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spine Fusion Using Cell Matrix Composites Enriched in Bone Marrow-Derived Cells
Open accessAbstract
Bone marrow-derived cells including osteoblastic progenitors can be concentrated rapidly from bone marrow aspirates using the surface of selected implantable matrices for selective cell attachment. Concentration of cells in this way to produce an enriched cellular composite graft improves graft efficacy. The current study was designed to test the hypothesis that the biologic milieu of a bone marrow clot will significantly improve the efficacy of such a graft. An established posterior spinal fusion model and cancellous bone matrix was used to compare an enriched cellular composite bone graft alone, bone matrix plus bone marrow clot, and an enriched bone matrix composite graft plus bone marrow clot. Union score, quantitative computed tomography, and mechanical testing were used to define outcome. The union score for the enriched bone matrix plus bone marrow clot composite was superior to the enriched bone matrix alone and the bone matrix plus bone marrow clot. The enriched bone matrix plus bone marrow clot composite also was superior to the enriched bone matrix alone in fusion volume and in fusion area. These data confirm that the addition of a bone marrow clot to an enriched cell-matrix composite graft results in significant improvement in graft performance. Enriched composite grafts prepared using this strategy provide a rapid, simple, safe, and inexpensive method for intraoperative concentration and delivery of bone marrow-derived cells and connective tissue progenitors that may improve the outcome of bone grafting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multilineage Cells from Human Adipose Tissue: Implications for Cell-Based Therapies
Zuk, P. A., Zhu, M., Mizuno, H., Huang, J., Futrell, J. W., Katz, A. J., Benhaim, P., Lorenz, H. P., & Hedrick, M. H. (2001) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/107632701300062859 · Cited by 7,956
Hernigou, P. (2005) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) · doi:10.2106/jbjs.d.02215 · Cited by 787
Muschler, G. F., Raut, V. P., Patterson, T. E., Wenke, J. C., & Hollinger, J. O. (2010) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0658 · Cited by 320
Self-citationTethered Epidermal Growth Factor Provides a Survival Advantage to Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Fan, V. H., Au, A., Tamama, K., Littrell, R., Richardson, L. B., Wright, J. W., Wells, A., & Griffith, L. G. (2007) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2006-0320 · Cited by 269
Stem cell homing in musculoskeletal injury
Fong, E. L. S., Chan, C. K., & Goodman, S. B. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.101 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Muschler, G. F., Nitto, H., Matsukura, Y., Boehm, C., Valdevit, A., Kambic, H., Davros, W., Powell, K., & Easley, K.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 407
- Issue
- 407
- Pages
- 102-118
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005853957
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spine Fusion Using Cell Matrix Composites Enriched in Bone Marrow-Derived Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003086-200302000-00018
- The paper
- Muschler, G. F., Nitto, H., Matsukura, Y., Boehm, C., Valdevit, A., Kambic, H., Davros, W., Powell, K., & Easley, K. (2003). Spine Fusion Using Cell Matrix Composites Enriched in Bone Marrow-Derived Cells. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200302000-00018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.