The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contact Lens-Related Microbial Keratitis: Part I
Abstract
Purpose To put into perspective the individual risk and the societal burden of contact lens microbial keratitis. Methods. I reviewed the available epidemiologic data on contact lens microbial keratitis with emphasis on distinguishing microbial from nonmicrobial keratitis, determining the incidence of the disease, the relative risk with different styles of contact lenses, and the risk factors. Results. Contact lens wear can be classified in multiple different ways (indications for wear, contact lens material, wearing schedule, and replacement schedule). Adverse effects of contact lens wear on the cornea have been documented by several studies. Distinction between aseptic and septic focal infiltrates is discussed. The incidence rates for bacterial microbial keratitis range from approximately two/10,000 per year for rigid contact lens, 2.2–4.1/10,000 per year for daily-wear soft contact lens, to 13.3–20.9/10,000 per year for extended-wear soft contact lenses. The risk with therapeutic contact lenses is much higher: ∼52/10,000 per year. Comparative studies suggest that the relative risk of microbial keratitis is ∼1 for rigid gas-permeable lenses (RGPs; the referent), 0.5–2.74 for polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), 1.0–4.2 for daily-wear soft contact lenses, 2.7–36.8 for extended-wear soft contact lenses, and 13.0–13.3 for disposable soft contact lens wear. The most significant risk factors include overnight wear, smoking, male sex, and socioeconomic status. Conclusions There is a sig…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Greater prevalence of contact lens microbial keratitis among male compared with female contact lens wearers14”
From Genders, sexes, and health: what are the connections—and why does it matter? (2003) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions – its mechanisms and methods for study
Bos, R. (1999) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1999.tb00396.x · Cited by 1,216
Genders, sexes, and health: what are the connections—and why does it matter?
Krieger, N. (2003) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyg156 · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- Liesegang, T. J.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Liesegang, Thomas J.
- ORCID
- Liesegang, Thomas J.
- Venue
- Cornea
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125???131
- ISSN
- 0277-3740 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029394608
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cornea (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Corneal surgery and disorders
- Keywords
- bacterial keratitis, extended-wear soft contact lenses, rigid gas permeable contact lenses, therapeutic contact lenses, incidence, risk factors, overnight contact lens wear, smoking, socioeconomic status, contact lens materials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contact Lens-Related Microbial Keratitis: Part I. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003226-199703000-00002
- The paper
- Liesegang, T. J. (1997). Contact Lens-Related Microbial Keratitis: Part I. Cornea. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199703000-00002