The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incidence and etiology of pneumonia acquired during mechanical ventilation
Abstract
A total of 77 consecutive patients submitted to mechanical ventilation (MV) for greater than 48 h in a respiratory ICU (RICU) were studied to investigate the incidence, etiology, and consequences of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Eighteen (23%) patients developed a bacterial pneumonia after 5.6 +/- 1.0 days (mean +/- SEM; range 2 to 17) of MV. Three additional cases were demonstrated at autopsy, raising the incidence to 27%. Overall, the mean duration of MV increased from 9.7 +/- 0.9 to 32.2 +/- 5.1 days (p less than .0001) when pneumonia developed. A longer period of hospital stay before RICU admission and the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were significant characteristics of patients with pneumonia when compared to patients without nosocomial pulmonary infection. One or more etiological agents were identified in 14 patients from the pneumonia group by means of a highly specific technique (protected brush catheter, transthoracic needle aspiration, pleural fluid, and/or blood cultures). The predominant pathogens isolated were Gram-negative bacilli (Acinetobacter sp. and Pseudomonas sp.). Half of the cases were polymicrobial. Compared to other series, our results may reflect with more accuracy the actual incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients, since we used highly accurate techniques along with autopsy findings which allowed us to confirm or discard the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Incidence, Risk, and Prognosis Factors of Nosocomial Pneumonia in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Torres, A., Aznar, R., Gatell, J. M., Jiménez, P., González, J., Ferrer, A., Celis, R., & Rodriguez-Roisin, R. (1990) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/142.3.523 · Cited by 916
Self-citationVentilator-Associated Pneumonia
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_225126 · Cited by 406
Extracranial complications of severe head injury
Piek, J., Chesnut, R. M., Marshall, L. F., Berkum-Clark, M. V., Klauber, M. R., Blunt, B. A., Eisenberg, H. M., Jane, J. A., Marmarou, A., & Foulkes, M. A. (1992) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1992.77.6.0901 · Cited by 324
Does This Patient Have Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia?
Klompas, M. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.297.14.1583 · Cited by 304
Nosocomial pneumonia in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
CHASTRE, J., TROUILLET, J. L., VUAGNAT, A., JOLY-GUILLOU, M. L., CLAVIER, H., DOMBRET, M. C., & GIBERT, C. (1998) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.157.4.9708057 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- JIMÉNEZ, P., TORRES, A., RODRÍGUEZ-ROISIN, R., DE LA BELLACASA, J. P., AZNAR, R., GATELL, J. M., & AGUSTÍ-VIDAL, A.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 882-885
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009435300
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence and etiology of pneumonia acquired during mechanical ventilation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003246-198909000-00007
- The paper
- JIMÉNEZ, P., TORRES, A., RODRÍGUEZ-ROISIN, R., DE LA BELLACASA, J. P., AZNAR, R., GATELL, J. M., & AGUSTÍ-VIDAL, A. (1989). Incidence and etiology of pneumonia acquired during mechanical ventilation. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-198909000-00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.