Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on survival in pediatric patients with acute respiratory failure

Green, Thomas P., Timmons, Otwell D., Fackler, James C., Moler, Frank W., Thompson, Ann E., Sweeney, Michael F.·1996·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used with increasing frequency in the treatment of acute respiratory failure in pediatric patients. Our objective in this study was to test the hypothesis that ECMO improves outcome in pediatric patients with acute respiratory failure. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Forty one pediatric intensive care units participated in the study under the auspices of the Pediatric Critical Care Study Group. PATIENTS: All pediatric patients admitted to the participating institutions with acute respiratory failure during 1991 were included. Patients with congenital heart disease, contraindications to ECMO, or incomplete data were excluded, yielding a data set of 331 patients from 32 hospitals. INTERVENTIONS: Conventional mechanical ventilation, high-frequency ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with survival. In a second analysis, pairs of ECMO and non-ECMO patients, matched by severity of disease and respiratory diagnosis, were compared. The use of ECMO (p = .0082), but not the use of high-frequency ventilation, was associated with a reduction in mortality. Other factors independently associated with mortality included oxygenation index (p < .0001), Pediatric Risk of Mortality score (PRISM) (p < .0001) and the Paco2 (p = .045). In 53 diagnosis- and risk-matched pairs, there was a significantly lower mortality rate (26.4% vs. 47.2%; p < .01) in the ECMO-treated patients. When all patients were stratified into mortality risk quartiles on the basis of oxygenation index and PRISM score, the proportion of deaths among ECMO-treated patients in the 50% to 75% mortality risk quartile was less than half the proportion in the non-ECMO treated patients (28.6% vs. 71.4% p < .05)> No effect was seen in the other quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ECMO was associated with an improved survival in pediatric patients with respiratory failure. The lack of association of outcome with treatment in the ECMO-capable hospital or with another tertiary technology (i.e. high-frequency ventilation) suggests that ECMO itself was responsible for the improved outcome. Further studies of this procedure are warranted but require broad-based multi-institutional participation to provide sufficient statistical power and sensitivity to demonstrate efficacy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00003246-199602000-00023

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Green, T. P., Timmons, O. D., Fackler, J. C., Moler, F. W., Thompson, A. E., & Sweeney, M. F.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
1996-02
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
323-329
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041452036
Cited by
177
References
0
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on survival in pediatric patients with acute respiratory failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003246-199602000-00023
The paper
Green, T. P., Timmons, O. D., Fackler, J. C., Moler, F. W., Thompson, A. E., & Sweeney, M. F. (1996). The impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on survival in pediatric patients with acute respiratory failure. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199602000-00023

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.