Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 872

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reversal of late septic shock with supraphysiologic doses of hydrocortisone

Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard, Charpentier, Claire, Levy, Bruno, Debouverie, Marc, Audibert, Gerard, Larcan, Alain·1998·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Preliminary studies have suggested that low doses of corticosteroids might rapidly improve hemodynamics in late septic shock treated with catecholamines. We examined the effect of hydrocortisone on shock reversal, hemodynamics, and survival in this particular setting. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Two intensive care units of a University hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-one patients with septic shock requiring catecholamine for >48 hrs. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned either hydrocortisone (100 mg i.v. three times daily for 5 days) or matching placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Reversal of shock was defined by a stable systolic arterial pressure (>90 mm Hg) for > or =24 hrs without catecholamine or fluid infusion. Of the 22 hydrocortisone-treated patients and 19 placebo-treated patients, 15 (68%) and 4 (21%) achieved 7-day shock reversal, respectively, a difference of 47% (95% confidence interval 17% to 77%; p = .007). Serial invasive hemodynamic measurements for 5 days did not show significant differences between both groups. At 28-day follow-up, reversal of shock was higher in the hydrocortisone group (p = .005). Crude 28-day mortality was 7 (32%) of 22 treated patients and 12 (63%) of 19 placebo patients, a difference of 31% (95% confidence interval 1% to 61%; p = .091). Shock reversal within 7 days after the onset of corticosteroid therapy was a very strong predictor of survival. There were no significant differences in outcome in responders and nonresponders to a short corticotropin test. The respective rates of gastrointestinal bleeding and secondary infections did not differ between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of modest doses of hydrocortisone in the setting of pressor-dependent septic shock for a mean of >96 hrs resulted in a significant improvement in hemodynamics and a beneficial effect on survival. These beneficial effects do not appear related to adrenocortical insufficiency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00003246-199804000-00010

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 872

Metadata

Authors
Bollaert, P.-E., Charpentier, C., Levy, B., Debouverie, M., Audibert, G., & Larcan, A.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
1998-04
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
645-650
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042268246
Cited by
872
References
27
FWCI
46.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reversal of late septic shock with supraphysiologic doses of hydrocortisone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003246-199804000-00010
The paper
Bollaert, P.-E., Charpentier, C., Levy, B., Debouverie, M., Audibert, G., & Larcan, A. (1998). Reversal of late septic shock with supraphysiologic doses of hydrocortisone. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199804000-00010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.