Cited by 144Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcarePalliative and Oncologic Care

End-of-life care in the pediatric intensive care unit: Attitudes and practices of pediatric critical care physicians and nurses

Burns, Jeffrey P., Mitchell, Christine, Griffith, John L., Truog, Robert D.·2001·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Objective To determine the attitudes and practices of pediatric critical care attending physicians and pediatric critical care nurses on end-of-life care. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting A random sample of clinicians at 31 pediatric hospitals in the United States. Measurements and main results The survey was completed by 110/130 (85%) physicians and 92/130 (71%) nurses. The statement that withholding and withdrawing life support is unethical was not endorsed by any of the physicians or nurses. More physicians (78%) than nurses (57%) agreed or strongly agreed that withholding and withdrawing are ethically the same (p Conclusions Nearly two-thirds of pediatric critical care physicians and nurses express views on end-of-life care in strong agreement with consensus positions on these issues adopted by national professional organizations. Clinicians with fewer years of pediatric critical care practice are less likely to agree with this consensus. Compared with physicians, nurses are significantly less likely to agree that families are well informed and ethical issues are well discussed when assessing actual practice in their intensive care unit. More collaborative education and regular case review on bioethical issues are needed as part of standard practice in the intensive care unit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00003246-200103000-00036

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Everyday ethics: ethical issues and stress in nursing practice

    Ulrich, C. M., Taylor, C., Soeken, K., O’Donnell, P., Farrar, A., Danis, M., & Grady, C. (2010) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05425.x · Cited by 305 · see citing works

    “…2007; Epstein, 2008); initiating, withholding, and withdrawing treatment and advance directives in acute and long-term care (Crego & Lipp 1998; Burns et al. 2001; Redman & Fry 2003); conflict resolution in parent-childprovider relationships in pediatric care (Butz et al. 1998); and physician…”
    BackgroundInfluential

Authors
Burns, J. P., Mitchell, C., Griffith, J. L., & Truog, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2001-03
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
658-664
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047807447
Cited by
144
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
end-of-life care, pediatric intensive care, clinician attitudes, physician-nurse differences, bioethics, family communication, ethical decision-making, professional consensus
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Death, Child, Child Advocacy, Critical Care, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Ethics, Medical, Ethics, Nursing, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Medical Staff, Hospital, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Pediatrics, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Surveys and Questionnaires, Terminal Care, United States, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review