Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adrenal insufficiency during septic shock*

Marik, Paul E., Zaloga, Gary P.·2003·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a baseline (random) cortisol concentration <25 microg/dL in patients with septic shock was a better discriminator of adrenal insufficiency than the standard (250 microg) and the low-dose (1 microg) corticotropin stimulation tests as assessed by the hemodynamic response to steroid replacement. SETTING: Intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Fifty-nine patients with septic shock. Their mean age was 57 +/- 16.7 yrs; 29 were male. INTERVENTIONS: A baseline cortisol concentration was obtained. Patients then received an intravenous injection of 1 microg of corticotropin (low-dose test) followed 60 mins later by an injection of 249 microg of corticotropin (high-dose test). Cortisol concentrations were obtained 30 and 60 mins after low- and high-dose corticotropin. All patients were administered hydrocortisone (100 mg every 8 hrs) for the first 24 hrs while awaiting results of cortisol assessment. Patients were considered steroid responsive if the pressor agent could be discontinued within 24 hrs of the first dose of hydrocortisone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of patients died. Twenty-two percent of patients met the diagnostic criteria of adrenal insufficiency by the low-dose test and 8% by the high-dose test. However, 61% of patients met the criteria of adrenal insufficiency when we used a baseline cortisol concentration of <25 microg/dL. Twenty-two patients (37%) were steroid responsive; the baseline serum cortisol was 14.1 +/- 5.2 microg/dL in the steroid-responsive patients compared with 33.3 +/- 18 microg/dL in the steroid-nonresponsive patients (p <.0001). Ninety-five percent of steroid-responsive patients had a baseline cortisol concentration <25 microg/dL. Fifty-four percent of steroid responders had a diagnostic low-dose test and 22% a diagnostic high-dose test. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a stress cortisol concentration of 23.7 microg/dL was the most accurate diagnostic threshold for determination of the hemodynamic response to glucocorticoid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Adrenal insufficiency is common in patients with septic shock, the incidence depending largely on the diagnostic test and criteria used to make the diagnosis. There is clearly no absolute serum cortisol concentration that distinguishes an adequate from an insufficient adrenal response. However, we believe that a random cortisol concentration of <25 microg/dL in a highly stressed patient is a useful diagnostic threshold for the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00003246-200301000-00022

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Marik, P. E., & Zaloga, G. P.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2003-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
141-145
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166962064
Cited by
379
References
5
FWCI
24.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.