The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deposition and Retention Models for Internal Dosimetry of the Human Respiratory Tract
Abstract
In 1964, ICRP Committee II created a special Task Group for the purpose of reviewing the so-called lung model, (1) a scheme for computing dust deposition in and clearance from the human respiratory tract thereby providing a basis for lung dosimetry and the setting of exposure limits. The principal working assumption adopted by the Task Group at the outset was that the present lung model used by Committee II is arbitrary in some respects and inadequate in others: its principal virtue is simplicity. We attempted, therefore, to improve the model in the first two regards and to maintain the third quality as desirable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deposition of sidestream cigarette smoke in the human respiratory tract
Charles Hiller, F. (1984) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0091-7435(84)80010-9 · Cited by 53
Montoya, L. D., & Hildemann, L. M. (2001) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00379-4 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Venue
- Health Physics
- Published
- 1966-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173???207
- ISSN
- 0017-9078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4232086341
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deposition and Retention Models for Internal Dosimetry of the Human Respiratory Tract. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00004032-196602000-00005
- The paper
- Deposition and Retention Models for Internal Dosimetry of the Human Respiratory Tract. (1966). Health Physics. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-196602000-00005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
