The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fatty Liver: Chemical Shift Phas and Suppression Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in Animals, Phantoms, and Humans
Abstract
In vitro animal and human models were used to evaluate the potential of chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing fatty liver. Phantoms of varying fat content were created from mayonnaise-agar preparations. Fatty liver was induced in eight rats by feeding them ethanol for three to six weeks (36% of total calories), whereas eight control rats were fed a normal diet. T1-weighted in-phase and opposed-phase MR images were obtained of the phantoms animals, and 28 human subjects. Additional images obtained in animals included long TR images with in-phase and opposed-phase technique, and hybrid chemical shift water and fat suppression. The rats were killed and histologic status was graded blindly by a hepatopathologist as normal, mild, moderate, or severe fatty change, for correlation with MR grading. Quantitative analysis of MR images included fat signal fraction for animals, and relative signal decrease between in-phase and opposed-phase images for phantom and human data. Phantom in-phase signal increased linearly with respect to fat content, whereas opposed-phase signal decreased linearly. MRI and histologic grading of rat livers were highly correlated, especially when based on water suppression images (r = 0.91, P = .0001). Opposed-phase images were also highly correlated, while fat suppression images were less effective. There was no overlap between MR-derived fat fractions for control (2.6%-5.7%) versus ethanol-fed rats (7.7%-17.9%, P = .0002). Human liver considered to be fatty by visual inspection (n = 8) had higher relative signal decrease than nonfatty liver (n = 22) (P less than .001). Phantom, animal, and human data demonstrate that comparison of T1-weighted in-phase and opposed-phase images is both practical and sensitive in the detection and grading of fatty liver.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The modified Dixon method was used to assess the hepatic fat fraction.”
From Leptin reverses nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with severe lipodystrophy† (2005) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leptin reverses nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with severe lipodystrophy†
Javor, E. D., Ghany, M. G., Cochran, E. K., Oral, E. A., DePaoli, A. M., Premkumar, A., Kleiner, D. E., & Gorden, P. (2005) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.20672 · Cited by 228
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Erickson, S. K. (2009) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r800089-jlr200 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- MITCHELL, D. G., KIM, I., CHANG, T. S., VINITSKI, S., SAPONARO, S. A., EHRLICH, S. M., RIFKIN, M. D., & RUBIN, R.
- Affiliations
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US)
- ORCID
- MITCHELL, DONALD G.
- Venue
- Investigative Radiology
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1041-1052
- ISSN
- 0020-9996 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2525830412
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Investigative Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › NMR spectroscopy and applications
- Keywords
- hepatic steatosis, chemical shift MRI, fat fraction quantification, T1-weighted imaging, fat suppression
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Animals, Fatty Liver, Fatty Liver, Alcoholic, Female, Humans, Liver, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Structural, Rats, Inbred Strains, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review