The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human Pharmacokinetics and Safety Evaluation of SonoVue™, a New Contrast Agent for Ultrasound Imaging
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess in humans the pharmacokinetics of SonoVue, a new echo contrast agent based on stabilized sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) microbubbles and to provide additional safety and tolerability information on the compound. METHODS: The blood kinetics and pulmonary elimination of SF6 after intravenous bolus injection of two dosage levels (0.03 and 0.3 mL/kg) of SonoVue were evaluated in 12 healthy subjects (7 men, 5 women). In addition, safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring vital signs, adverse effects, discomfort, and physical examination and laboratory parameters associated with the SonoVue injection. RESULTS: The blood kinetics of SF6 was not dose dependent. SF6 was rapidly removed from the blood by the pulmonary route, with 40% to 50% of the injected dose eliminated within the first minute after administration and 80% to 90% eliminated by 11 minutes after administration; the elimination was similar in men and women and independent of dose. Both dosages were well tolerated. No adverse effects were observed immediately or during the 24-hour follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: SonoVue was shown to be rapidly removed from the blood. The route of SF6 elimination was by means of the lungs in the expired air. SonoVue appeared to be safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhang, C., Yan, K., Fu, C., Peng, H., Hawker, C. J., & Whittaker, A. K. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00632 · Cited by 493
Metadata
- Authors
- MOREL, D. R., SCHWIEGER, I., HOHN, L., TERRETTAZ, J., LLULL, J. B., CORNIOLEY, Y. A., & SCHNEIDER, M.
- Venue
- Investigative Radiology
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80
- ISSN
- 0020-9996 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087196106
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.