Prediction of Clinical Response to Methylphenidate in Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Abstract
Objective To examine the pattern of individual responses to to methylphenidate (MPH) in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and to examine factors that predict drug response. Method Individual drug response was defined on the basis of changes on the Abbreviated Conners Rating Scales completed by parents and teachers. These scales were the main outcome measures in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of MPH. Response prediction was examined in stepwise discriminant analyses, in which baseline variables and the response to a single, 10-mg dose of MPH were entered. Results Predictors of a strong MPH response were a high IQ, considerable inattentiveness, young age, low severity of disorder, and low rates of anxiety. A positive response to a single dose of MPH significantly improved the prediction of less stringently defined levels of MPH response. Conclusion Only strong levels of response could be predicted by baseline characteristics. Severity of disorder based on clinical judgment and improvement after a single dose of MPH are found to be important contributors to response prediction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies in children found that ADHD outcomes of pharmacological treatment were similar among those with and without concurrent CD.
“and several studies in children found that ADHD outcomes of pharmacological treatment were similar among those with and without concurrent CD [82,83,84].”
From Treatment of Adolescents with Concurrent Substance Use Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [82]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 24 · Cited by 160
- Authors
- BUITELAAR, J. K., VAN DER GAAG, R. J., SWAAB-BARNKVHLD, H., & KUIPKR, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- BUITELAAR, JAN K.
- ORCID
- BUITELAAR, JAN K.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1025-1032
- ISSN
- 0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082397420
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- methylphenidate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, treatment response prediction, children, baseline predictors, inattention, IQ, disorder severity, anxiety, Conners rating scales
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Double-Blind Method, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Multivariate Analysis, Discriminant Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review