Cited by 160Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Prediction of Clinical Response to Methylphenidate in Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

BUITELAAR, JAN K., VAN DER GAAG, RUTGER JAN, SWAAB-BARNKVHLD, HANNA, KUIPKR, MARC. A·1995·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To examine the pattern of individual responses to to methylphenidate (MPH) in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and to examine factors that predict drug response. Method Individual drug response was defined on the basis of changes on the Abbreviated Conners Rating Scales completed by parents and teachers. These scales were the main outcome measures in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of MPH. Response prediction was examined in stepwise discriminant analyses, in which baseline variables and the response to a single, 10-mg dose of MPH were entered. Results Predictors of a strong MPH response were a high IQ, considerable inattentiveness, young age, low severity of disorder, and low rates of anxiety. A positive response to a single dose of MPH significantly improved the prediction of less stringently defined levels of MPH response. Conclusion Only strong levels of response could be predicted by baseline characteristics. Severity of disorder based on clinical judgment and improvement after a single dose of MPH are found to be important contributors to response prediction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-199508000-00012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 24 · Cited by 160

Authors
BUITELAAR, J. K., VAN DER GAAG, R. J., SWAAB-BARNKVHLD, H., & KUIPKR, M. A.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
BUITELAAR, JAN K.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-08
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
1025-1032
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082397420
Cited by
160
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
methylphenidate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, treatment response prediction, children, baseline predictors, inattention, IQ, disorder severity, anxiety, Conners rating scales
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Double-Blind Method, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Multivariate Analysis, Discriminant Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review