The Third Factor of the WISC-III: It's (Probably) Not Freedom From Distractibility
Abstract
Objective This study examined the ecological validity, construct validity, and diagnostic utility of the third factor of the WISC-III, heuristically labeled "Freedom From Distractibility" (FFD). Method A sample of 200 children, aged 6 to 11 years, with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) completed the WISC-III, the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised, and the Test of Variables of Attention. Objective parent and teacher report measures of attention and hyperactivity were completed. Results Mean FFD scores were significantly lower than other WISC-III factor scores. The diagnostic utility of FFD is limited, however, as the majority of these children did not show a significant relative weakness on this index. Correlational analyses failed to support the concurrent, ecological, or construct validity of the FFD. FFD scores were not correlated with a measure of sustained visual attention. Findings suggest that among children with ADHD, a low FFD score may be associated with the presence of a learning disability or poor academic performance. This finding was maintained after level of general intelligence was statistically controlled. Conclusions Clinicians and researchers should not view FFD as a reliable or valid index of attention or as a diagnostic screening measure for identifying children with ADHD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior studies with samples of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder yielded fairly disappointing results in terms of the discriminatory power of the WISC-III Freedom from Distractibility index.
“Prior studies with samples of children with attention-deficit 0 hyperactivity disorder yielded fairly disappointing results in terms of the discriminatory power of this index (Doyle et al., 2000; Reinecke et al., 1999).”
From Criterion validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition after pediatric traumatic brain injury (2008) · cites this paper as Reinecke et al., 1999
Cites
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74 · Cited by 5,510 · see citing works
Impact of Comorbid Oppositional or Conduct Problems on Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
KUHNE, M., SCHACHAR, R., & TANNOCK, R. (1997) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199712000-00020 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Relationship between Prenatal PCB Exposure and Intelligence (IQ) in 9-Year-Old Children
Stewart, P. W., Lonky, E., Reihman, J., Pagano, J., Gump, B. B., & Darvill, T. (2008) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.11058 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Differences between preschool children with ODD, ADHD, and ODD+ADHD symptoms
Gadow, K. D., & Nolan, E. E. (2002) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00012 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Executive Dysfunction in School-Age Children With ADHD
Lambek, R., Tannock, R., Dalsgaard, S., Trillingsgaard, A., Damm, D., & Thomsen, P. H. (2011) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054710370935 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Antshel, K. M., Faraone, S. V., Stallone, K., Nave, A., Kaufmann, F. A., Doyle, A., Fried, R., Seidman, L., & Biederman, J. (2007) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01735.x · Cited by 117 · see citing works
The development of prosocial behaviour in children and adolescents: a twin study
Scourfield, J., John, B., Martin, N., & McGuffin, P. (2004) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.t01-1-00286.x · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Do Attention Deficits Influence IQ Assessment in Children and Adolescents with ADHD?
Jepsen, J. R. M., Fagerlund, B., & Mortensen, E. L. (2009) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054708322996 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
DONDERS, J., & JANKE, K. (2008) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617708080752 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
McGill, R. J., Dombrowski, S. C., & Canivez, G. L. (2025) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.23457 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“This lack of a coherent theoretical alignment has plagued interpretation of prior editions (e.g., Reinecke et al. 1999; Saklofske et al. 2006).”
- Authors
- Reinecke, M. A., Beebe, D. W., & Stein, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Children's National (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reinecke, Mark A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 322-328
- ISSN
- 0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012286269
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- WISC-III, third factor, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, construct validity, ecological validity, diagnostic value, sustained visual attention, learning disabilities, academic performance, intelligence
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Psychometrics, Wechsler Scales, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review