Cited by 66Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

The Third Factor of the WISC-III: It's (Probably) Not Freedom From Distractibility

Reinecke, Mark A., Beebe, Dean W., Stein, Mark A.·1999·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective This study examined the ecological validity, construct validity, and diagnostic utility of the third factor of the WISC-III, heuristically labeled "Freedom From Distractibility" (FFD). Method A sample of 200 children, aged 6 to 11 years, with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) completed the WISC-III, the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised, and the Test of Variables of Attention. Objective parent and teacher report measures of attention and hyperactivity were completed. Results Mean FFD scores were significantly lower than other WISC-III factor scores. The diagnostic utility of FFD is limited, however, as the majority of these children did not show a significant relative weakness on this index. Correlational analyses failed to support the concurrent, ecological, or construct validity of the FFD. FFD scores were not correlated with a measure of sustained visual attention. Findings suggest that among children with ADHD, a low FFD score may be associated with the presence of a learning disability or poor academic performance. This finding was maintained after level of general intelligence was statistically controlled. Conclusions Clinicians and researchers should not view FFD as a reliable or valid index of attention or as a diagnostic screening measure for identifying children with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-199903000-00020

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior studies with samples of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder yielded fairly disappointing results in terms of the discriminatory power of the WISC-III Freedom from Distractibility index.

    “Prior studies with samples of children with attention-deficit 0 hyperactivity disorder yielded fairly disappointing results in terms of the discriminatory power of this index (Doyle et al., 2000; Reinecke et al., 1999).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reinecke, M. A., Beebe, D. W., & Stein, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Children's National (US)
Corresponding author
Reinecke, Mark A.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-03
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
322-328
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012286269
Cited by
66
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
WISC-III, third factor, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, construct validity, ecological validity, diagnostic value, sustained visual attention, learning disabilities, academic performance, intelligence
MeSH terms
Achievement, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Psychometrics, Wechsler Scales, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review