Factors Associated With Early Dropout From Adolescent Psychiatric Outpatient Treatment
Abstract
Objective To examine background factors, psychopathology, and psychosocial impairment among adolescents complying with or dropping out early from outpatient psychiatric treatment. Method Family background, psychiatric history, and other data were collected prospectively on 143 male and 154 female outpatients aged 12 to 22 years. DSM-II-R psychiatric diagnoses were assessed at the end of treatment. Results Fifty-three adolescents (17.8%) attended 1 or 2 treatment appointments, and 33 of them (11.1% of 297) then dropped out; 50.5% of the total attended 3 to 13, and 31.6% attended 14 or more appointments. Low parental socioeconomic status was more common among the early dropouts than the other patient groups (88%, 69%, 63%, respectively). The early dropouts had had more problems with the law than the adolescents attending 14 or more appointments (18%, 6%), but less suicidal behavior (24%, 56%, respectively). Among the early dropouts, mood disorders were less common (21%, 49%), especially major depression (0%, 20%), and substance abuse was more common (9%, 0%) than among patients attending 14 or more appointments. Conclusions Low parental socioeconomic status, not having mood disorder, not having psychotropic medication, and having substance abuse were associated with early dropout of adolescents from outpatient psychiatric treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Estimated prevalence of dropout varies from 15 to 60% and is even higher among young people, particularly in the age group of 15-24 years.
“Estimated prevalence varies from 15 to 60 % [3–6] and is even higher among young people [4, 7–9], particularly in the age group of 15–24 years [4].”
From Determinants of dropout in a community-based mental health crisis centre (2016) · cites this paper as [7]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 32 · Cited by 83
- Authors
- PELKONEN, M., MARTTUNEN, M., LAIPPALA, P., & LÖNNQVIST, J.
- Affiliations
- Tampere University (FI)
- Corresponding author
- PELKONEN, MIRJAMI
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 329-336
- ISSN
- 0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986274558
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- treatment discontinuation, parental socioeconomic status, substance abuse, mood disorders, major depressive disorder, suicidal behavior, psychotropic drugs, psychosocial impairment
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Ambulatory Care, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Dropouts, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Comorbidity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review