CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 347Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologySubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesReligion and Society Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Religiosity and Substance Use and Abuse Among Adolescents in the National Comorbidity Survey

Open access
MILLER, LISA, DAVIES, MARK, GREENWALD, STEVEN·2000·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
DOI 10.1097/00004583-200009000-00020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To replicate previous findings among adults of an inverse association between religiosity and substance use among a nationally representative sample of adolescents. METHOD: Subjects were 676 (328 female and 348 male) adolescents in the National Comorbidity Survey who were assessed for substance use and abuse with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Religiosity was assessed through affiliation with religious denomination and through response to 7 questions concerning belief and practice. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analyses replicated in adolescents the 2 religiosity factors of personal devotion and personal conservatism previously identified by Kendler among adults, although the 2 factors were more highly correlated in adolescents than in adults. Personal devotion (a personal relationship with the Divine) and affiliation with more fundamentalist religious denominations were inversely associated with substance use and substance dependence or abuse across a range of substances (alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, or any contraband drug). Personal conservatism (a personal commitment to teaching and living according to creed) was inversely associated with use of alcohol only. CONCLUSION: Low levels of religiosity may be associated with adolescent onset of substance use and abuse.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-200009000-00020

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 347

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
MILLER, L., DAVIES, M., & GREENWALD, S.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
MILLER, LISA
ORCID
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
39
Issue
9
Pages
1190-1197
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/00004583-200009000-00020
OpenAlex
W2033193929
Cited by
347
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NIMH (R01MH46376)
  • W.T. Grant Foundation (grant 90135190)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religiosity, adolescent substance use, substance abuse, private devotion, religious fundamentalism, alcohol consumption, cannabis use, cocaine use, National Comorbidity Survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Christianity, Culture, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Population Surveillance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Socialization, United States, Risk Assessment, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review