Parent-Defined Target Symptoms Respond to Risperidone in RUPP Autism Study: Customer Approach to Clinical Trials
Abstract
Objective A consumer-oriented efficacy assessment in clinical trials should measure changes in chief complaint and consumer request (symptoms of most concern to patient/caregiver), which may be diluted in change scores of multisymptom scales.Method In the Research Units on Pediatric Psychopharmacology (RUPP) Autism Network 8-week double-blind trial of risperidone versus placebo, the chief concerns of parents were collected at 0, 4, and 8 weeks (endpoint), in addition to standardized primary measures. Blinded clinical judges rated change from baseline to 4 and 8 weeks on a 9-point scale (1 = normalized, 5 = unchanged, 9 = disastrous); 94 participants had usable data.Results The most common symptoms identified by parents were tantrums, aggression, and hyperactivity. Interrater reliability was excellent. Mean ratings at endpoint were 2.8 +/- 1.2 on risperidone and 4.5 +/- 1.3 on placebo (p <.001). Ratings were collinear with Clinical Global Impression-Improvement and Aberrant Behavior Checklist Irritability subscale (primary dimensional measure). Effect size d was 1.4, compared to 1.2 on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist Irritability subscale. Effect sizes varied twofold by symptom category, largest for self-injury (2.11) and tantrums (1.95).Conclusions Risperidone was superior to placebo in reducing symptoms of most concern to parents of autistic children with irritable behavior. Rating individualized participant-chosen target symptoms seems a reliable, sensitive, efficient, and consumer-friendly way to assess treatment effect and might have clinical application.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Target Situation vignette procedure is well-recognised and has high levels of agreement between expert raters.
“Using a well-recognised procedure with high levels of agreement between expert raters (Arnold et al., 2003; Maskey et al., 2014; Maskey et al., 2019a, 2019b, 2019c, 2019d)”
The IU target situations rating method has an ICC of 0.895 for a panel of five experts.
“Arnold et al. [40] report ICC of 0.895 for a panel of five experts.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 218
- Authors
- ARNOLD, L. E., VITIELLO, B., MCDOUGLE, C., SCAHILL, L., SHAH, B., GONZALEZ, N. M., CHUANG, S., DAVIES, M., HOLLWAY, J., AMAN, M. G., CRONIN, P., KOENIG, K., KOHN, A. E., MCMAHON, D. J., & TIERNEY, E.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- ARNOLD, L. EUGENE
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1443-1450
- ISSN
- 0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073691187
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- risperidone, autism spectrum disorder, tantrums, aggression, hyperactivity, self-harm, inter-rater reliability, pediatric psychopharmacology
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Aggression, Autistic Disorder, Child, Clinical Trials as Topic, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Placebos, Research Design, Severity of Illness Index, Stereotyped Behavior, Observer Variation, Treatment Outcome, Dopamine Antagonists, Risperidone, Endpoint Determination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review