The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Matched-Pair, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Acticoat* Silver-Coated Dressing for the Treatment of Burn Wounds
Abstract
A new silver-coating technology was developed to prevent wound adhesion, limit nosocomial infection, control bacterial growth, and facilitate burn wound care through a silver-coated dressing material. For the purposes of this article, Acticoat (Westaim Biomedical Inc, Fort Saskatchawan, Alberta, Canada) silver-coated dressing was used. After in vitro and in vivo studies, a randomized, prospective clinical study was performed to assess the efficacy and ease of use of Acticoat dressing as compared with the efficacy and ease of our institution's standard burn wound care. Thirty burn patients with symmetric wounds were randomized to be treated with either 0.5% silver nitrate solution or Acticoat silver-coated dressing. The dressing was evaluated on the basis of overall patient comfort, ease of use for the wound care provider, and level of antimicrobial effectiveness. Wound pain was rated by the patient using a visual analog scale during dressing removal, application, and 2 hours after application. Ease of use was rated by the nurse providing wound care. Antimicrobial effectiveness was evaluated by quantitative burn wound biopsies performed before and at the end of treatment. Patients found dressing removal less painful with Acticoat than with silver nitrate, but they found the pain to be comparable during application and 2 hours after application. According to the nurses, there was no statistically significant difference in the ease of use. The frequency of burn wound sepsis (> 10(5) organisms per gram of tissue) was less in Acticoat-treated wounds than in those treated with silver nitrate (5 vs 16). Secondary bacteremias arising from infected burn wounds were also less frequent with Acticoat than with silver nitrate-treated wounds (1 vs 5). Acticoat dressing offers a new form of dressing for the burn wound, but it requires further investigation with greater numbers of patients in a larger number of centers and in different phases of burn wound care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Church, D., Elsayed, S., Reid, O., Winston, B., & Lindsay, R. (2006) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.19.2.403-434.2006 · Cited by 1,876
Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Alexiadou, K., & Doupis, J. (2012) · Diabetes Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13300-012-0004-9 · Cited by 565
In vitro cytotoxity of silver: implication for clinical wound care
Poon, V. K. M., & Burd, A. (2004) · Burns · doi:10.1016/j.burns.2003.09.030 · Cited by 527
Comparative evaluation of silver‐containing antimicrobial dressings and drugs
Castellano, J. J., Shafii, S. M., Ko, F., Donate, G., Wright, T. E., Mannari, R. J., Payne, W. G., Smith, D. J., & Robson, M. C. (2007) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2007.00316.x · Cited by 434
Silver dressings: their role in wound management
Leaper, D. J. (2006) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2006.00265.x · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Tredget, E. E., Shankowsky, H. A., Groeneveld, A., & Burrell, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 531-537
- ISSN
- 0273-8481 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980123426
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Matched-Pair, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Acticoat* Silver-Coated Dressing for the Treatment of Burn Wounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00004630-199811000-00013
- The paper
- Tredget, E. E., Shankowsky, H. A., Groeneveld, A., & Burrell, R. (1998). A Matched-Pair, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Acticoat* Silver-Coated Dressing for the Treatment of Burn Wounds. Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630-199811000-00013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.