The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spatial Filtering of Multichannel Electroencephalographic Recordings Through Principal Component Analysis by Singular Value Decomposition
Abstract
Principal component analysis (PCA) by singular value decomposition (SVD) may be used to analyze an epoch of a multichannel electroencephalogram (EEG) into multiple linearly independent (temporally and spatially noncorrelated) components, or features; the original epoch of the EEG may be reconstructed as a linear combination of the components. The result of SVD includes the components, expressible as time series waveforms, and the factors that determine how much each component waveform contributes to each EEG channel. By omission of some component waveforms from the linear combination, a new EEG can be reconstructed, differing from the original in useful ways. For example, artifacts can be removed and features such as ictal or interictal discharges can be enhanced by suppressing the remainder of the EEG. We developed a variation of this technique in which the factors that reconstruct the modified EEG from the original are stored as a matrix. This matrix is applied to multichannel EEG at successive times to create a new EEG continuously in real time, without redoing the time-consuming SVD. This matrix acts as a spatial filter with useful properties. We successfully applied this method to remove artifacts, including ocular movement and electrocardiographic artifacts. Removal of myogenic artifacts was much less complete, but there was significant improvement in the ability to visualize underlying activity in the presence of myogenic artifacts. The major limitations of the method are its inability to completely separate some artifacts from cerebral activity, especially when both have similar amplitudes, and the possibility that a spatial filter may distort the distribution of activities that overlap with the artifacts being removed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation
Jung, T., Makeig, S., Humphries, C., Lee, T.-W., McKeown, M. J., Iragui, V. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577200980259 · Cited by 3,334
EEG artifact removal—state-of-the-art and guidelines
Urigüen, J. A., & Garcia-Zapirain, B. (2015) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/12/3/031001 · Cited by 963
Stimulus experience modifies auditory neuromagnetic responses in young and older listeners
Ross, B., & Tremblay, K. (2009) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.012 · Cited by 159
Spatial Filtering for EEG-Based Regression Problems in Brain–Computer Interface (BCI)
Wu, D., King, J.-T., Chuang, C.-H., Lin, C.-T., & Jung, T.-P. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2017.2688423 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Lagerlund, T. D., Sharbrough, F. W., & Busacker, N. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-82
- ISSN
- 0736-0258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971913428
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial Filtering of Multichannel Electroencephalographic Recordings Through Principal Component Analysis by Singular Value Decomposition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00004691-199701000-00007
- The paper
- Lagerlund, T. D., Sharbrough, F. W., & Busacker, N. E. (1997). Spatial Filtering of Multichannel Electroencephalographic Recordings Through Principal Component Analysis by Singular Value Decomposition. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199701000-00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.