Cited by 159Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Comparison of Venlafaxine, Trazodone, and Placebo in Major Depression

Abstract

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was undertaken to compare the safety and efficacy of venlafaxine and trazodone in patients with major depression. Two hundred twenty-five patients entered an initial 6-week treatment phase, and 149 completed it. Ninety-six patients who were responders continued in a 1-year, double-blind, long-term phase during which they received the same medication and doses they had during the short-term phase. Both active treatments were significantly more effective than placebo on some measures during the short-term study, but venlafaxine produced more improvement in the cognitive disturbance and retardation factors on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Trazodone was more effective against the sleep disturbance factor. Patients on venlafaxine were most likely to enter the long-term phase and to remain in the trial longest. The side effect profiles of the three treatment groups were compared. Venlafaxine was most likely to cause nausea, whereas trazodone was associated with the most dizziness and somnolence.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004714-199404000-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
CUNNINGHAM, L. A., BORISON, R. L., CARMAN, J. S., CHOUINARD, G., CROWDER, J. E., DIAMOND, B. I., FISCHER, D. E., & HEARST, E.
Affiliations
  • Augusta University (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
CUNNINGHAM, LYNN A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
1994-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
99???106
ISSN
0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989376957
Cited by
159
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
venlafaxine, trazodone, major depressive disorder, antidepressant efficacy, antidepressant safety, adverse effects, nausea, dizziness, sleepiness, sleep disorders, cognitive disorders, long-term maintenance therapy
MeSH terms
Venlafaxine Hydrochloride, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Blood Pressure, Cyclohexanols, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Time Factors, Trazodone, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review