Cited by 61Treatment of Major DepressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fluoxetine in Major Depression: Efficacy, Safety and Effects on Sleep Polygraphic Variables

Abstract

Fluoxetine (60 mg), a selective inhibitor of the reuptake of 5-HT, was compared in a double-blind trial to amitriptyline (150 mg) in a sample of 34 patients fitting the Research Diagnostic Criteria for a major depressive disorder. Patients were studied after a drug washout period of 10 days and an active treatment period of 42 days. Sleep polygraphic recordings were performed before and at the end of the study. As indicated by the significant decrease in the Hamilton Depression scale and the Montgomery Asberg Depression scale, fluoxetine showed similar antidepressant effects to amitriptyline with significantly fewer adverse effects. Fluoxetine and amitriptyline decreased the amount of REM sleep, a well known effect of classical antidepressants. Fluoxetine showed some specific effects on sleep continuity (potentially dose related) as indicated by the significant increase in the number of awakenings and in stage shifts, without interfering with the therapeutic response.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004850-199010000-00002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amitriptyline (150mg) and fluoxetine (60mg) both produced significant REM sleep suppression.

    “(Kerkhofs et al., 1990) demonstrated that amitriptyline (150mg) and fluoxetine (60mg) both produced significant REM sleep suppression.”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Kerkhofs et al., 1990

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
KERKHOFS, M., RIELAERT, C., MAERTELAER, V. D., LINKOWSKI, P., CZARKA, M., & MENDLEWICZ, J.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus Hospital (BE)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Venue
International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
1990-10
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
253-260
ISSN
0268-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060954042
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
fluoxetine, amitriptyline, major depressive disorder, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, REM sleep reduction, sleep continuity, sleep awakenings, adverse drug reactions, antidepressant efficacy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amitriptyline, Depression, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review