The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Citalopram and imipramine in the treatment of depressive patients in general practice. A Nordic multicentre clinical study
Abstract
Two dose levels of citalopram, 10-30 mg and 20-60 mg, were compared with imipramine, 50-150 mg, in depressed patients treated in general practice. This was a multicentre study carried out in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland. The duration of treatment was 6 weeks with an optional continuation phase of a further 16 weeks. The patients were assessed by means of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD), Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), and a visual analogue self-rating scale for depression. Observed and spontaneously reported adverse events were recorded. A total of 472 patients were entered into the study and 400 patients completed the 6 week trial period. A total of 297 patients completed the optional 22 week double-blind period. A clear reduction of the HAMD total scores was seen in all three treatment groups with no significant differences between groups. A reduction of the HAMD anxiety factor and sleep factor scores was also seen with no significant differences between treatments. The imipramine-treated patients showed a higher frequency of adverse events, especially the anticholinergic type, than citalopram-treated patients. Most patients entered into the continuation phase remained well.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Citalopram (10-60mg) was associated with significantly better HAMD sleep scores (from baseline), but did not differ from imipramine (50-100mg).
“(Rosenberg et al., 1994) demonstrated that citalopram (10-60mg) was associated with significantly better HAMD sleep scores (from baseline), but did not differ from imipramine (50-100mg).”
From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Rosenberg et al., 1994
Clinician ratings of sleep (via HAMDS) have improved with amitriptyline, clomipramine, imipramine, dothiepin and doxepin.
“Clinician ratings of sleep (via HAMDS) have improved with amitriptyline (Versiani et al., 1999), clomipramine (Lepine et al., 2000), imipramine (Rosenberg et al., 1994), dothiepin (Corne and Hall, 1989) and doxepin (Feighner et al., 1986).”
From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Rosenberg et al., 1994
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anderson, I. M. (2000) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00092-0 · Cited by 940
Antidepressants and their effect on sleep
Mayers, A. G., & Baldwin, D. S. (2005) · Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/hup.726 · Cited by 323
Braun, C., Adams, A., Rink, L., Bschor, T., Kuhr, K., & Baethge, C. (2020) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.13235 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenberg, C., Damsbo, N., Fuglum, E., Jacobsen, L. V., & Horsgård, S.
- Affiliations
- Lundbeck (Denmark) (DK)
- Venue
- International Clinical Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 41-48
- ISSN
- 0268-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054957335
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- citalopram, imipramine, depression, antidepressant efficacy, general practice, dose comparison, adverse events, anticholinergic effects, anxiety, sleep, continuation phase
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Depressive Disorder, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Imipramine, Long-Term Care, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Patient Care Team, Personality Inventory, Citalopram
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review