The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of fluoxetine on sleep: a longitudinal, double-blind polysomnographic study of healthy volunteers
Abstract
Fluoxetine, a selective inhibitor of serotonin (5-HT) uptake, was compared with placebo in a randomized double-blind longitudinal trial in 12 healthy volunteers. Sleep polygraphic recordings were performed at home twice before and once after 6 days of medication. After 6 days fluoxetine significantly decreased the amount of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. The sleep-onset latency and REM latency were increased, but there was no significant increase in the amount of awakenings during night. The relative proportion of stages 2 and 3 increased after fluoxetine administration, although there was no significant change with regard to total amount of slow-wave sleep. Fluoxetine did not induce prominent eye movements during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep in this study. Results of the subjective assessment revealed tendencies of improved sleep and well-being in the fluoxetine group. It is concluded that a comparatively small dose of fluoxetine (20 mg/day) causes the same type of changes in REM sleep which are characteristic of most antidepressive drugs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fluoxetine (20mg) increased REM sleep latency and reduced overall REM proportion, increased sleep stages 2 and 3, increased sleep latency and worsened sleep efficiency, compared to placebo, in healthy participants.
“(Vasar et al., 1994) demonstrated that fluoxetine (20mg) increased REM sleep latency and reduced overall REM proportion, increased sleep stages 2 and 3, increased sleep latency and worsened sleep efficiency, compared to placebo.”
From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Vasar et al., 1994
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The reinterpretation of dreams: An evolutionary hypothesis of the function of dreaming
Revonsuo, A. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00004015 · Cited by 676
Antidepressants and their effect on sleep
Mayers, A. G., & Baldwin, D. S. (2005) · Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/hup.726 · Cited by 323
Depression, sleep physiology, and antidepressant drugs
Winokur, A., Gary, K. A., Rodner, S., Rae-Red, C., Fernando, A. T., & Szuba, M. P. (2001) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.1043 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Vasar, V., Appelberg, B., Rimón, R., & Selvaratnam, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Tartu (EE)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Venue
- International Clinical Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-206
- ISSN
- 0268-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086989516
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- fluoxetine, sleep, REM sleep, sleep latency, REM latency, sleep stages, slow-wave sleep, NREM sleep, antidepressant side effects, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, subjective sleep quality
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Electroencephalography, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Reaction Time, Sleep Stages, Sleep, REM, Wakefulness, Polysomnography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review