Cited by 39Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersTreatment of Major Depression

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The effect of fluoxetine on sleep: a longitudinal, double-blind polysomnographic study of healthy volunteers

Vasar, V., Appelberg, B., Rimón, R., Selvaratnam, J.·1994·International Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Fluoxetine, a selective inhibitor of serotonin (5-HT) uptake, was compared with placebo in a randomized double-blind longitudinal trial in 12 healthy volunteers. Sleep polygraphic recordings were performed at home twice before and once after 6 days of medication. After 6 days fluoxetine significantly decreased the amount of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. The sleep-onset latency and REM latency were increased, but there was no significant increase in the amount of awakenings during night. The relative proportion of stages 2 and 3 increased after fluoxetine administration, although there was no significant change with regard to total amount of slow-wave sleep. Fluoxetine did not induce prominent eye movements during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep in this study. Results of the subjective assessment revealed tendencies of improved sleep and well-being in the fluoxetine group. It is concluded that a comparatively small dose of fluoxetine (20 mg/day) causes the same type of changes in REM sleep which are characteristic of most antidepressive drugs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004850-199409000-00009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fluoxetine (20mg) increased REM sleep latency and reduced overall REM proportion, increased sleep stages 2 and 3, increased sleep latency and worsened sleep efficiency, compared to placebo, in healthy participants.

    “(Vasar et al., 1994) demonstrated that fluoxetine (20mg) increased REM sleep latency and reduced overall REM proportion, increased sleep stages 2 and 3, increased sleep latency and worsened sleep efficiency, compared to placebo.”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Vasar et al., 1994

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vasar, V., Appelberg, B., Rimón, R., & Selvaratnam, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Tartu (EE)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
1994-09
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
203-206
ISSN
0268-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086989516
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
fluoxetine, sleep, REM sleep, sleep latency, REM latency, sleep stages, slow-wave sleep, NREM sleep, antidepressant side effects, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, subjective sleep quality
MeSH terms
Adult, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Electroencephalography, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Reaction Time, Sleep Stages, Sleep, REM, Wakefulness, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review