The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence of the main cardiovascular risk factors in Morocco: results of a National Survey, 2000
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of the main cardiovascular risk factors in Morocco and their distribution according to age, sex and residential area. METHODS: The study was conducted during the year 2000 on a Moroccan representative sample aged 20 years and over, considering the population distribution between urban and rural areas. The crude results were weighted according to the Moroccan population distribution by age and sex. In order to allow comparison with data from other countries, means and prevalence were standardized according to world population distribution by age. RESULTS: The participation rate was 90.1%. The prevalence of hypertension was 33.6% (30.2% for men and 37.0% for women). The means of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 129.8 and 76.0 mmHg, respectively. The prevalence of diabetes was 6.6% and was similar for males and females. The prevalence of hypercholesterolaemia was 29.0%, and was higher in females. The means and prevalence of diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia were higher in urban areas. The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia increased with age. The prevalence of obesity was markedly higher in females and in urban areas. The average body mass index was 23.8 and 25.6 kg/m2 in males and females, respectively. Thirty-four per cent of men smoked cigarettes, but women rarely smoked cigarettes (0.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors was high in Morocco and it is necessary to increase action against the cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030
Shaw, J. E., Sicree, R. A., & Zimmet, P. Z. (2010) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007 · Cited by 7,216
Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035
Guariguata, L., Whiting, D. R., Hambleton, I., Beagley, J., Linnenkamp, U., & Shaw, J. E. (2014) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002 · Cited by 4,642
Estimating the Prevalence and Awareness Rates of Hypertension in Africa: A Systematic Analysis
Adeloye, D., & Basquill, C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104300 · Cited by 311
Diabetes in developing countries
Misra, A., Gopalan, H., Jayawardena, R., Hills, A. P., Soares, M., Reza‐Albarrán, A. A., & Ramaiya, K. L. (2019) · Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1111/1753-0407.12913 · Cited by 300
Mehio Sibai, A., Nasreddine, L., Mokdad, A. H., Adra, N., Tabet, M., & Hwalla, N. (2010) · Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism · doi:10.1159/000321527 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Tazi, M. A., Abir-Khalil, S., Chaouki, N., Cherqaoui, S., Lahmouz, F., Sraïri, J. E., & Mahjour, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Hypertension
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 897-903
- ISSN
- 0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974901485
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of the main cardiovascular risk factors in Morocco: results of a National Survey, 2000. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00004872-200305000-00013
- The paper
- Tazi, M. A., Abir-Khalil, S., Chaouki, N., Cherqaoui, S., Lahmouz, F., Sraïri, J. E., & Mahjour, J. (2003). Prevalence of the main cardiovascular risk factors in Morocco: results of a National Survey, 2000. Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-200305000-00013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.