Cited by 40Psychometric Methodologies and TestingSexual function and dysfunction studiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE MEASUREMENT OF SEXUAL ATTITUDE: THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL AS A MEASURE OF SEXUAL ATTITUDE IN SEXUAL DEVIATIONS

MARKS, ISAAC M., SARTORIUS, NORMAN H.·1967·The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005053-196712000-00002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
MARKS, I. M., & SARTORIUS, N. H.
Venue
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Published
1967-12
Volume
145
Issue
6
Pages
441-451
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063474974
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2015: 1
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
sexual attitudes, attitude measurement, psychometric scale development
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Anxiety, Attitude, Depression, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Paraphilic Disorders, Phobic Disorders, Psychosexual Development, Sex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review